3
$\begingroup$

This may seem a very simple question, but I did not find any answer for it on the Internet.

It is known that the Sieve of Erastothenes can be analytically stated as:

$$\pi(x)-\pi(x^{\frac{1}{2}})+1=\sum_{d} (-1)^{\nu(d)} \left \lfloor \frac {x}{d} \right \rfloor$$

Where the sum is over the divisors $d$ of the primorial of order $\sqrt{x}$ (the product of all the primes lower or equal to $\sqrt{x}$), $\nu(d)$ is the number of prime divisors of $d$ and $\pi(x)$ is the Prime Counting Function .

Where can I find a proof of this statement? When I search for information about this sieve online, I only find algorithms for counting primes and approximations or bounds for $\pi(x)$. I understand that this can be a simple subject, but I would like to read a formal proof about it.

Thank you.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Consider a number $x$ and a list of primes $p_i$ less than $\sqrt{x},$ $p_1,p_2,...,p_m.$ Sieve out multiples of primes in the list less than $x,$ to wit: $2, 4, 6,...,$ etc., $3,6,9,...,$ etc., so that we have taken out $[x/2], [x/3],...,[x/p_i]$, etc., numbers.

Some of those we removed are are duplicates since, for example, $6$ would be removed both as a multiple of $2$ and of $3$. So remove from this initial sieving multiples of two primes, $2\cdot3, 3\cdot 5,$ etc., so we are excluding from the sieve $[x/6],[x/15],...,[x/(p_ip_j)]$ numbers.

But again we are removing some numbers twice, such as 30, which has as divisors both $2\cdot3 $ and $3\cdot 5.$ We throw those back into the sieve.

We continue until we reach the prime $p_m.$ Having sieved for all primes less than $\sqrt{x}$ we are left with primes between $\sqrt{x}$ and $x$, as well as $1,$ which was not sieved.

So we have

$$\pi(x)-\pi(\sqrt{x})+ 1 = x-[x/2]-[x/3]...+[x/(2\cdot3]+[x/(3\cdot 5)]...- [x/(2\cdot3\cdot 5)])... $$

A more compact notation for this expression is

$$\pi(x)-\pi(\sqrt{x})=~-1 + \sum_{d|D}\mu(d)\left[\frac{x}{d}\right] $$

in which $\mu(x)$ is the Mobius function and $D$ is the product of primes less than or equal to $\sqrt{x}$. A proof that the Mobius function assigns the correct sign to each expression $[x/d]$ can be found in many references $^1$. The point is that the right hand side is the number of numbers in $(1,x)$ which are coprime to primes less than or equal to $p_m,$ the largest prime not exceeding $\sqrt{x}.$ We subtract 1 because it is left over and not considered a prime.

The expression on the right can also be expressed in terms of sets. Anything that captures the inclusion-exclusion process described above is acceptable.

$^1 [x]$ is the floor function, often denoted $\lfloor x \rfloor$ in modern texts.

$^2$ See, for example, Narkiewicz, The Development of Prime Number Theory at p.33.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.