1
$\begingroup$

Let $K_{1}$, $K_{2}$ be two algebraic extension of the field $F$ contained in the field $L$. Prove that the F-algebra $K_{1}\otimes K_{2}$ has no non-zero nilpotent elements? What if L has characterestic 0?

I don't have a clue. If $K_{1}, K_{2}$ are finite extensions of $F$ and $[K_{1}K_{2}:F]=[K_{1}:F][K_{2}:F]$, then $K_{1} \otimes K_{2} \cong K_{1}K_{2}$ as F-algebras. Hence $K_{1}\otimes K_{2}$ being a field will not contain any nilpotent elements except 0. But what about the other cases?

Thanks in advance!!!

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JefLaga beat me to it... Are you missing separability hypotheses? $\endgroup$ – peter a g Jun 1 '17 at 14:59
  • $\begingroup$ You should probably indicate that you edited your question, I assume in response to the answer below - otherwise it makes the answer look a bit out of place... edit: Oh I see you did in your comment below $\endgroup$ – peter a g Jun 1 '17 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah I actually did say in the comment below.. $\endgroup$ – Riju Jun 1 '17 at 15:22
3
$\begingroup$

(Edit: answer given before characteristic 0 assumption added)

This is not true. Let $F = \mathbb{F}_p(t)$, $K_1$ the algebraic closure of $F$ and $K_2 = F(\alpha) \subset K_1$ with $\alpha$ a root of the irreducible polynomial $X^p-t$. Then $K_2 = F[X]/(X^p-t)$ and $$K_1\otimes K_2 \cong K_1 \otimes F[X] /(X^p-t) \cong K_1[X]/(X^p-t) = K_1[X]/(X^p-\alpha^p) \cong K_1[X]/(X-\alpha)^p$$ And this last algebra contains the nilpotent $(X-\alpha)$.

(Edit: answer after characteristic 0 assumption added)

Suppose we would have an element $\sum x_i\otimes y_i$ of $K_1\otimes K_2$ which is nilpotent. Since it is a finite linear combination of elementary tensors, it can also be seen as an element of $L_1\otimes L_2$ where $L_i\subset K_i$ are finite extensions of $F$. Here we use the fact that the natural map $L_1\otimes L_2 \hookrightarrow K_1\otimes K_2 $ is injective. So we only need to prove it when $L_1$ and $L_2$ are finite. This has already explained by another answer and can also be found for example here: http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/galoistheory/separable2.pdf

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Of course one can also take $L= K_1=K_2$. $\endgroup$ – peter a g Jun 1 '17 at 15:02
  • $\begingroup$ @Jef Laga Sorry for the inconvenience.. I have edited the question.. but you can keep your answer .. Thanks!!! $\endgroup$ – Riju Jun 1 '17 at 15:19
2
$\begingroup$

The answer to your question is contained in the following general lemma (see e.g. Cassels-Fröhlich, chap. II, §9): keeping your notations $F, K_1, K_2$ and assuming that $K_2 /F$ is finite separable, one can show that $K_1 \otimes K_2$ is isomorphic to the direct sum of a finite numbers of fields $L_j$ which can be viewed as extensions of both $K_1 , K_2$. For details, see op. cit., but the principle of proof is simple enough: by hypothesis, $K_2$ is of the form $F(\alpha)$; let $f(X)\in F[X]$ be the irreducible polynomial of $\alpha$ over $F$, and decompose $f(X)$ into $\prod_j g_j (X)$, where the $g_j$'s are distinct irreducible in $K_1 [X]$; then $L_j \cong K_1 [X]/(g_j)$. The direct sum of the $L_j$'s may have divisors of zero, but it contains no non zero nilpotent element.

Note that this is not contradictory with the answer of @Jef Laga because of our additional separability hypothesis on $K_2$ .

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.