2
$\begingroup$

I'm calculating ratios from paired samples and there is a point I don't understand. Supposed that I measured the values of 2 paired samples: A and B, and then I calculate the ratios from those values.

Ratio 1: $\frac{A}{B} = 0.5$

Ratio 2: $\frac{A}{B} = 2.0$

Normally one would calculate the average $ratio = \frac{(Ratio 1 + Ratio 2)}{2} = 1.25$. Then the conclusion would be: the value of A is 1.25 times higher than that of B.

But, the ratios can be understood as:

Ratio 1 = 0.5 --> the value of B is double the value of A

Ratio 2 = 2 --> the value of A is double the value of B

Then, the average ratio of A and B should be equal 1.

Does that make sense to you? Where is the flaw?

Thanks all,

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There are different concepts of mean, and it is upto you to decide which is useful. Your idea is known as geometric mean $\endgroup$ – Guy May 28 '17 at 9:47
  • $\begingroup$ If you think the ratios $0.5$ and $2.0$ are in a sense equal and opposite, you might consider using geometric means or logarithms $\endgroup$ – Henry May 28 '17 at 22:08
0
$\begingroup$

Your ratios imply $A=0.5B$ and $A=2.0B$.

These multiplicative relationships are compatible with geometric sequences and the geometric mean which is $\sqrt{0.5 \times 2}=1$

The 'flaw' is using the arithmetic mean $\frac{0.5+2}{2}$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.