# Find the eigenvalues and a basis for an eigenspace of matrix A

Find the eigenvalues and a basis for each eigenspace of matrix A:

\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 2 & -2 & 2 \\ 2 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}

I found the eigenvalues by computing $|A-\lambda I|$:

$\lambda_1 = 0,$ $\lambda_2 = 1,$ $\lambda_3 = -2$

How do I find a basis for each eigenspace of matrix A?

## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I tried the following:

$\lambda = 0:$

\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 2 & -2 & 2 \\ 2 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}

Do reduced row echelon form:

\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}

Does this mean one of the results is \begin{bmatrix} 0\\ t\\ t\\ \end{bmatrix}

and to find the other two answers, do the same thing except set $\lambda$ equal to the other two values? Or does finding the basis for each eigenspace of matrix A mean something different?

## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Observe that the product of a matrix and column vector is a linear combination of the columns of the matrix with coefficients given by the vector. Adding the second column to the third produces zero, so $(0,1,1)^T$ is an eigenvector of $0$. Because these two columns cancel each other if their coefficients in a linear combination are equal, one can also see that $A(1,2,2)^T=(1,2,2)^T$, so $(1,2,2)^T$ is an eigenvector of $1$. You get the third eigenvalue “for free” because the trace of the matrix is equal to the sum of the eigenvalues, so the last eigenvalue is $1+(-2)-(0+1)=-2$. An eigenvector for this eigenvalue might be harder to spot than the first two (subtract the first column from the third), so you can always fall back on the standard method for this last eigenspace, namely, finding the null space of $A+2I$.
• Thank you! How would I write the results for the basis of eigenspaces correctly? Would it just be the three eigenvectors separated by commas and inside brackets like this: $\{[Ev], [Ev2],[Ev3]\}$ – BurstFlame May 29 '17 at 20:06
Correct, you subtract each eigenvalue from the main diagonal and use row reduction to find the eigenvectors. You may also want to spend a minute or two trying to spot the eigenvectors because that tends to be faster than row reduction. For instance in your case the second and third columns are scalar multiples of each other and you can use this information to get the eigenvector $(0,1,1)^T$, which corresponds to the eigenspace $\{(0,t,t)^T : t \in \mathbf{R} \}$.
For the eigenvalue of $1$ you are looking for a vector $v$ with $Av = v$. If $v = (a, b, c)^T$ then $Av = (a - 3b + 3c, 2a - 2b + 2c, 2a)^T$. Thus $2a = c$ and we can now do this again with $A(a,b,2a)^T = (7a - 3b, 6a - 2b, 2a)^T$. This gives you the equations $7a - 3b = a$ and $6a - 2b = b$, both equivalent to $6a - 3b = 0$. Hence one eigenvector ($a = 1$) is $(1,2,2)^T$. This process is basically row reduction. I am making use of the fact that the third row has just one entry to try to move through the steps a bit faster. For practice, use row reduction to verify that this is the correct eigenvector.