First, let us consider $\gamma''.$ We have $\gamma' = {\bf T}$ and so $\gamma'' = {\bf T}' = \kappa{\bf N}.$ If $\gamma'' = f\gamma$ then it tells us that $\gamma \propto {\bf N}$ and so both the osculating and the normal planes pass through the origin.
Next, let us differentiate the expression $\gamma'' = f\gamma.$ We get $\gamma''' = f'\gamma + f \gamma' = f'\gamma + f{\bf T}$. Consider the left hand side, we know that $\gamma' = {\bf T}$ and so $\gamma'' = {\bf T}' = \kappa{\bf N}$, and finally
$$\gamma''' = (\kappa{\bf N})' = \kappa'{\bf N} + \kappa{\bf N}' = \kappa'{\bf N} + \kappa(\tau{\bf B}-\kappa{\bf T}) = -\kappa^2{\bf T} + \kappa'{\bf N} + \kappa\tau{\bf B} \, . $$
Thus, $\gamma''' = f'\gamma + f{\bf T}$ implies $f'\gamma + f{\bf T} = -\kappa^2{\bf T} + \kappa'{\bf N} + \kappa\tau{\bf B}.$ We have already seen that $\gamma \propto {\bf N}$. Let us write $\gamma = \alpha{\bf N}.$ Fianlly we get:
$$\alpha f'{\bf N} + f{\bf T} = -\kappa^2{\bf T} + \kappa'{\bf N} + \kappa\tau{\bf B} \, . $$
Since ${\bf T},$ ${\bf N}$ and ${\bf B}$ are linearly independent it follows that $f=-\kappa^2$, $\alpha f' = \kappa'$ and $\kappa\tau=0.$
One possibility is that $\kappa \equiv 0$.
Let us assume $\kappa \not\equiv 0$. It follows from $\kappa\tau = 0$ that $\tau \equiv 0,$ and $f = - \kappa^2$.