# Show that $\boldsymbol 1_{\{1/n\mid n\in\mathbb N^*\}\cup\{0\}}$ Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$.

Let $$\mathcal D=\left\{\frac{1}{n}\mid n\in\mathbb N^*\right\}\cup\{0\}.$$ Show that $\boldsymbol 1_{\mathcal D}$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$.

Attempts

Let $f_n(x)=\boldsymbol 1_{\mathcal A_n}$ where $A_n=[0,\frac{1}{2^n}]\cup\bigcup_{k=1}^n\left[\frac{1}{k}-\frac{1}{2^n},\frac{1}{k}+\frac{1}{2^n}\right]\cap[0,1]$. We have that $\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb N^*}A_n=\mathcal D$, and that $(f_n)$ is a sequence of step function that converge pointwise to $\boldsymbol 1_{\mathcal D}$ and $(f_n)$ is decreasing. In particular, $$0\leq \overline{S}(f) \leq \frac{(n+1)}{2^n}\to 0.$$ Since $\underline{S}(f)=0$, the claim follow. I recall that $\overline{S}(f)=\inf_{\sigma }\{\overline{S}_\sigma\mid \sigma \text{ is a subdivision of }[0,1] \}$ and $\underline{S}(f)=\sup_{\sigma }\{\underline{S}_\sigma\mid \sigma \text{ is a subdivision of }[0,1] \}$

and $\overline{S}_\sigma =\sum_{i}M_i(x_{i+1}-x_i)$ and $\underline{S}_\sigma =\sum_{i}m_i(x_{i+1}-x_i)$ where $m_i=\min_{[x_{i},x_{i+1}]}f$ and $M_i=\max_{[x_i,x_{i+1}]}f$.

• Or you could observe that this function is bounded and has a countable number of discontinuities. Any function on a finite interval with these properties is Riemann integrable there (this is known as Lebesgue's Criterion). It can be relaxed to having a set of discontinuities with measure zero. – MPW May 24 '17 at 14:38
• @Surb: Your function is discontinuous at every point of $[0,1]$ – MPW May 24 '17 at 14:42
• @MPW: Thank you but is my proof correct ? – user330587 May 29 '17 at 12:17

Here an "easy" construction. Let $\varepsilon>0$ and $N$ s.t. $\frac{1}{N}<\varepsilon$. Let $$\sigma _k : 0<\frac{1}{kN}<\frac{2}{kN}<...<\frac{k}{kN},$$

$$\tilde \sigma _k : \frac{k}{kN}<\frac{k+1}{kN}<...<\frac{kN}{kN}=1,$$ and $$\tau_k: 0<\frac{1}{kN}<...<1.$$

If I denote $S^{\sigma _k}(a,b)$ is the upper Darboux sum on $[a,b]$, we have $$S^{\tau _k}(0,1)=S^{\sigma _k}\left(0,\frac{1}{N}\right)+S^{\tilde \sigma _k}\left(\frac{1}{N},1\right) \leq \frac{k}{kN}+S^{\tilde \sigma _k}\left(\frac{1}{N},1\right)< \varepsilon+S^{\tilde \sigma _k}\left(\frac{1}{N},1\right).$$

Now, you know that your function is piecewise continuous on $\left[\frac{1}{N},1\right]$ and thus integrable, and it's easy to prove that the integral is $0$. Therefore, $$\lim_{k\to \infty }S^{\tilde \sigma _k}\left(\frac{1}{N},1\right)=0,$$ and thus $$0\leq \bar S\leq \lim_{k\to \infty }S^{\tau_k}\leq \varepsilon+\lim_{k\to \infty }S^{\tilde \sigma _k}\left(\frac{1}{N},1\right)=\varepsilon.$$ We therefore proved that $\bar S=0,$ and the claim follow.

• That's long time to have an answer haha :) thank you anyway. – user330587 Jul 10 '18 at 19:22

hint

Let $\epsilon>0$ given.

at $[\epsilon/2,1]$, $f$ is a step function, and it is integrable . thus there exist a subdivision $\sigma$ of $[\epsilon/2,1]$ such that

$U (f,\sigma)-L (f,\sigma)<\frac {\epsilon}{2}$

let $\sigma_1=\sigma \cup \{0\}$. $$U (f,\sigma_1)-L (f,\sigma_1)=$$ $$\leq \frac {\epsilon}{2}+1.\frac {\epsilon}{2}$$

since $f$ is bounded at $[0,\frac {\epsilon}{2}]$.

• Thank you. 1st: is my proof correct ? Then, there is something strange in your proof. I think you should prove that $U(f,\sigma _1)-L(f,\sigma _1)\leq \delta$ for all $\delta\in [0,\varepsilon/2]$. But since your interval depend on $\varepsilon$, I'm not sure that to prove that $U(f,\sigma _1)-L(f,\sigma _1)\leq \varepsilon$ is enough. For example, for $\chi_{\mathbb Q\cap[0,1]}$ we have that $U(f,\sigma _1)-L(f,\sigma _1)\leq \varepsilon/2$ but it's not riemann integrable. – user330587 May 24 '17 at 16:18