3
$\begingroup$

While reading this solution set, I came across the following statement.

In a Galois extension $K / F$, the number of Galois conjugates of any $\alpha \in K$ is equal to:

\begin{equation*} \left| \text{Gal}(K/F) : \text{Gal}(K/F(\alpha)) \right| \end{equation*} and I am a bit perplexed where this number comes from.

After thinking about this question for a bit, I realized that there is a "backdoor" approach to figuring this out. We know that the minimal polynomial for $\alpha$, i.e. $m_{\alpha}(x)$, is equal to the squarefree part of the polynomial \begin{equation*} \prod_{\sigma \in \text{Gal}(K/F)} (x - \sigma(\alpha)) \end{equation*} which has degree equal to the number of distinct Galois conjugates $\sigma(\alpha)$. We also know that $\text{deg}(m_{\alpha}(x))$ is equal to $[F(\alpha): F]$. But this is exactly what the index of $\text{Gal}(K/F)$ in $\text{Gal}(K/F(\alpha))$ is equal to, since: \begin{align*} \left| \text{Gal}(K/F) : \text{Gal}\big(K/F(\alpha) \big) \right| & = \frac{ [K:F]}{[K:F(\alpha)]} \\[0.65em] & = [F(\alpha):F] \end{align*}

But I'm wondering if it is possible to see more "directly" that the number of (distinct) Galois conjugates of $\alpha$ is the number \begin{equation*} \left| \text{Gal}(K/F) : \text{Gal}\big(K/F(\alpha) \big) \right| \end{equation*}

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The number of conjugates of $\;\alpha\in K\;$ ( over $\;F\;$ ) is the number of different roots of the minimal polynomial of $\;\alpha\;$ in $\;F[x]\;$ , which is $\;[F(\alpha):F]=\;$ the degree of the polynomial mentioned above. $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio May 22 '17 at 22:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DonAntonio That is more or less the OP's argument in the post. $\endgroup$ – Kenny Wong May 22 '17 at 22:18
  • $\begingroup$ @SamY. Why do you think that ${\rm Gal}(K/F(\alpha))$ is a normal subgroup of ${\rm Gal}(K/F)$? This is true if and only if $F(\alpha)$ is a normal extension of $F$; it is not true in general. [By the way, you also wrote ${\rm Gal}(K/F(\alpha))$ and ${\rm Gal}(K/F)$ the wrong way round in your post.] $\endgroup$ – Kenny Wong May 22 '17 at 22:19
  • $\begingroup$ @KennyWong Indeed. These posts that write "I don't understand this or that..." and then later it happens to be they actually do perplex me. I many times address the OP's very question and don't read the whole thing. $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio May 22 '17 at 22:20
  • $\begingroup$ @KennyWong You are right. I forgot that the symbol $|G:H|$ makes sense even when $H$ is not normal. When I wrote that question, I was thinking you needed $H$ to be a normal subgroup of $G$...but you are right - $|G:H|$ is just the number of left cosets of $H$ in $G$. $\endgroup$ – Sam Y. May 22 '17 at 22:25
2
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\Gal}{\text{Gal}}$ Sometimes when $|A| = |B|$, it is because there is really an underlying bijection between $A$ and $B$.

Since $|\Gal(K/F) : \Gal(K/F(\alpha))|$ is the number of cosets of $\Gal(K/F(\alpha))$ in $\Gal(K/F)$, and this is the same as the number of Galois conjugates of $\alpha$, we might ask if we can establish a bijection between cosets of $\Gal(K/F(\alpha))$ in $\Gal(K/F)$ and conjugates of $\alpha$.

This is true, and we can see it as follows: Let $S$ be the set of conjugates of $\alpha$. $G$ acts on $S$ transitively, and the stabilizer of $\alpha \in S$ is the set of Galois elements fixing $\alpha$, equivalently, fixing $F(\alpha)$, i.e. $\Gal(K/F(\alpha))$, which establishes that $S$ and $\Gal(K/F)/\Gal(K/F(\alpha))$ are isomorphic as $\Gal(K/F)$-sets.

If you only care about the numbers, then you can use the Orbit-Stabilizer theorem to conclude that $|\Gal(K/F)| = |S||\Gal(K/F(\alpha))|$.

Edit: If you'd rather have something more concrete, the bijection between cosets and conjugates is given by $\sigma\Gal(K/F(\alpha)) \mapsto \sigma\alpha$. You can check this is a bijection in the same way you would check the stuff about group actions above.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $\sigma\alpha = \sigma'\alpha$ then $\sigma^{-1}\sigma\alpha = \alpha$ and thus $\sigma^{-1}\sigma'$ fixes alpha and is therefore in $\text{Gal}(K/F(\alpha))$, which means that $\sigma$ and $\sigma'$ are in the same coset. $\endgroup$ – user263190 May 23 '17 at 2:23
  • $\begingroup$ I think this plus the last 3 lines should be your answer (and that $Gal(K/F(\alpha))$ is naturally a subgroup of $Gal(K/F)$) $\endgroup$ – reuns May 23 '17 at 2:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.