# Integral of a Fourier Transform using properties

I have to evaluate this integral, using properties of the Fourier Transform. $$\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} w^2 |\hat{g}(w)|^2 dw$$ where $g(t) = e^{-|t|} , t\in R$

As far as I understood I cannot use Plancherel because $g(t) \notin S(R)$ (please, correct me if I'm wrong) but the prof. told me I should not determinate the Fourier Transform and compute the integral, because I can easily evaluate it using FT properties.

Is there somebody who can help me please?

Your function $g \in L^1(\mathbb{R}) \cap L^2(\mathbb{R})$ fails to be differentiable at $0$, but that's OK, since $$g^\prime(t) = \begin{cases} -e^{-\lvert t \rvert} &\text{if t > 0,}\\ e^{-\lvert t \rvert} &\text{if t < 0,} \end{cases}$$ still defines a perfectly good element of $L^1(\mathbb{R}) \cap L^2(\mathbb{R})$, such that $$g(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t g^\prime(s)\,ds$$ for almost every $t$, and this is certainly enough (see, e.g., Property 2.1 in these notes) to conclude that $$\widehat{g^\prime}(w) = 2\pi i w \widehat{g}(w)$$ for almost every $w$. In particular, since $g^\prime$ is square integrable, so too is $\widehat{g^\prime}$, so you're perfectly free to apply Plancherel.

So, you now have everything you need to reduce the problem to elementary calculus. However, to be just a little bit more explicit:

1. By the above discussion, your integral is precisely $\tfrac{1}{4\pi^2}\|\widehat{g^\prime}\|_2^2$.
2. By Plancherel's theorem, you know that $\|\widehat{g^\prime}\|_2^2 = \|g^\prime\|_2^2$.
3. By the explicit formula for $g^\prime$ above, you know that $\|g^\prime\|_2^2 = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2\lvert t \rvert}\,dt$, which you can simplify even further by splitting up this one improper integral into two (i.e., $\int_{-\infty}^0 + \int_0^{\infty}$) and observing that the function $t \mapsto e^{-2\lvert t \rvert}$ is even.

You now have everything you need to reduce your original integral to an extremely simple improper (Riemann!) integral on $(0,\infty)$.

• Can you please also evaluate the integral? thank you – PeppeDAlterio May 26 '17 at 7:41
• I've added a few more hints, but it really does reduce to elementary calculus. – Branimir Ćaćić May 26 '17 at 12:07