3
$\begingroup$

Let $F$ be a field of characteristic $p$. Show that if $X^p-X-a$ is reducible in $F[X]$, then it splits into distinct factors in $F[X]$.

I have no problem understanding it's solution except for one part. The solution assumes that it has one root $\alpha$ if it's reducible. Does reducible imply that polynomial has a root? For example:- $$(x+2)^4 - 2 = ((x+2)^2 - \sqrt 2)((x+2)^2 + \sqrt 2)$$ has two factors in $\Bbb Q[\sqrt 2]$ but has no root. Of course my example does not apply here.

How to show that $X^p-X-a$ has root in it's reducible in $F[X]$ for finite field? Does it apply to all reducible polynomials in polynomial rings over finite fields?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

First consider the case $a\ne 0$. In an algebraic closure $\bar F$, there will be a root $\alpha$, but we cannot know a priori if it will be $\in F$ (and in fact it cannot be). By the Frobenius homomorphism $\Phi$, $\alpha^p$ is also a root. But $\alpha^p=\alpha+a$. We conclude by induction that the $p$ distinct numbres $\alpha,\alpha+a,\alpha+2a,\ldots,\alpha+(p-1)a$ are the $p$ roots of $X^p-X-a$ in $\bar F$. And $\Phi$ acts transitively on this set of roots. On the other hand, if $X^p-X-a=f(X)g(X)$, then $\Phi$ takes roots of $f$ to roots of $f$ and roots of $g$ to roots of $g$. It follows that one of $f,g$ must have $p$ distinct roots, so the factorization is trivial.

Remains the case $a=0$. But then trivially all elements of the prime field are roots!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ how do we show that $\alpha \in F$ if $a \neq 0$ ? $\endgroup$ – Santosh Linkha May 22 '17 at 17:36
  • $\begingroup$ Suppose $\beta$ is a root; then $(\beta+a)^p-(\beta+a)-a=a^p-a$ (I use $\beta$ for better clarity). Then $\beta+a$ is a root if and only if $a^p=a$, which is only true if $a$ belongs to the prime subfield, which doesn't seem among the hypotheses. $\endgroup$ – egreg May 22 '17 at 17:37
  • $\begingroup$ Is the following reasoning correct? The splitting field of $f$ over $F$ is $F(\alpha)$, so any $\sigma \in \operatorname{Gal}(f/F)$ is completely determined by $\sigma(\alpha)$, hence we can write $\operatorname{Gal}(f/F) = \{\sigma_k \mid \sigma_k(\alpha) = \alpha + k, k \in \mathbb{F}_p\}$ which is cyclic and generated by $\sigma_1$. $\endgroup$ – Alex Vong May 23 '17 at 4:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.