1
$\begingroup$

in Friedberg book on linear algebra - 4th edition, Theorem 6.6 on page 350

Theorem 6.6: Let $W$ be a finite dimensional subspace of an inner product space $V$, and let $y\in V$. Then there exist unique vectors $u\in W$ and $z\in W^{\perp}$ such that $y=u+z$. Furthermore, if $\{v_1,v_2,...,v_k\}$ is an orthonormal basis for $W$, then

$$u=\sum_{i=1}^{k} \langle y,v_i\rangle v_i$$

Proof: Let $\{v_1,v_2,...,v_k\}$ be an orthonormal basis for $W$, let $u$ be as defined in the preceeding equarion, and let $z=y-u$. Clearly $u\in W$ and $y=u+z$.

To show that $z\in W^{\perp}$, it suffices to show that $z$ is orthogonal to each $v_j$. For any $j$, we have

$$\langle z,v_j\rangle =\langle \left( y-\sum_{i=1}^{k} \langle y,v_i\rangle v_i \right),v_j\rangle=\langle y,v_j\rangle - \sum_{i=1}^{k}\langle y,v_i\rangle\langle v_i,v_j\rangle=\langle y,v_j\rangle-\langle y,v_j\rangle=0$$

....

My question is: In the proof, he used the second part of the theorem ( which is a corollary for the first part) to prove the first part. How can it be a proof ?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ In the second edition it is Proposition 6.6 and it first shows that formula with the sum and something else. It is a very easy proof, in fact. You better write down the exact theorem and its proof as shown in that edition. $\endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Commented May 20, 2017 at 19:35
  • $\begingroup$ @DonAntonio , I edited the question and wrote down the proof $\endgroup$
    – weam nour
    Commented May 20, 2017 at 19:52

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Well, no: he only defined a vector by the formula of the second part and showed what he did show. This is not using part of what has to be proved in the proof, which is completely wrong in any logic I can think of.

So he defines $\;u\;$ as he does, and then he shows $\;z=y-u\in W^\perp\;$ , and since trivially $\;y=u+z\;$ we are done except for the uniqueness part, which I pressume is what must be in the part where you wrote periods ...

Nothing wrong here.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ So, why this formula is true ? $\endgroup$
    – weam nour
    Commented May 20, 2017 at 20:21
  • $\begingroup$ i get it. thanks $\endgroup$
    – weam nour
    Commented May 20, 2017 at 20:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .