-1
$\begingroup$

If i want to prove and equation has exactly two real roots, how would i do so? What theorem would i use, Rolle's or Bolzano's or something else?

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by Shailesh, erfink, Chris Brooks, Leucippus, Claude Leibovici May 15 '17 at 5:44

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Shailesh, Chris Brooks, Leucippus, Claude Leibovici
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ The answer depend on an equation. About which equation we say? $\endgroup$ – Michael Rozenberg May 15 '17 at 4:01
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelRozenberg what about for something like $2^x=2-x^2$ ? $\endgroup$ – H4-math May 15 '17 at 4:11
1
$\begingroup$

About equation $2^x+x^2=2.$

Let $f(x)=2^x+x^2$.

Hence, $f''(x)=2^x\ln^22+2>0$, which says that $f$ is a convex function.

Thus, the equation $f(x)=2$ has two roots maximum and indeed, $0.653...$ and $-1.25...$ are roots.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Is there other ways though? Only because I don't think we've done anything about convex's in class... $\endgroup$ – H4-math May 15 '17 at 4:36
  • $\begingroup$ I've found that f(-2)>0, f(0)<0 and f(1)>0 so according the the Intermediate Value Theorem there is two roots, but i feel like thats not definitive enough/does not show it has exactly two real roots? $\endgroup$ – H4-math May 15 '17 at 4:42
0
$\begingroup$

In principle, I would use Bolzano's theorem, the method consists in the fact that the function $f$ is easy to evaluate in points of my domain so that a change of sign is noticed. It is, in general, more comfortable to work with the derivative of a function, so I would also try to see if $f'$ has a root, although this is more likely to serve me only to prove existence since Rolle's theorem does not relate the roots of $f'$ with $f$. For example, for the equation $2^x = 2+x^2$ we can write it in the form $$ f(x)=0,\quad \text{con} ~ f(x)=2^x+x^2-2. $$ Then, we evaluate $f$ at $x = -2,0,1$ and we obtain that $$ f(-2)>0,\quad f(0)<0, \quad f(1)>0, $$ therefore we have that $f$ admits roots within the intervals $]-2,0[,~]0,1[$. And so, we can be even more careful in our analysis, we can also look at the graphs of the functions $g(x)=2^x$ and $h(x)=2-x^2$ (for which we can help the information given by the first and second derivatives) looking for their intersections.\ The Rolle theorem guarantees that if $f$ has $k$ roots then $f'$ has $k-1$ roots. In our example, if $f(x)=2^x+x^2-2$ had at least 3 roots then $f'$ would have at least 2 roots. Calculated $$ f'(x) = 2^x \ln(2) + 2x, $$ only has one root. This tells us that $f(x)=2^x+x^2-2$ has at most 2 roots.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.