See http://www.jstor.org/stable/1971241?seq=6#page_scan_tab_contents, pages 598 and 599.

Let $X$ be a nonsingular projective variety, $\alpha : D \rightarrow H := \text{Hom}_k(\mathbb{P}^1, X; j)$ where

  • $D$ is non-singular
  • $[\phi] \in \alpha(D)$ where $\phi:\mathbb{P}^1\rightarrow C \subset X$
  • $\phi(0) = P, \phi(\infty)=Q \in X$
  • $j := \phi|_{0,\infty}$

(We do know that dim$_{[\phi]}H \geq 2$.) $\alpha$ induces a morphism $F:\mathbb{P}^1\times D \rightarrow X\times D$. Let $\bar D$ be the compactification of $D$, $Y$ be the closure of the image of $F$, and $\tilde Y$ be the normalization of $Y$. This gives a morphism

$$\pi: \tilde Y \rightarrow Y \rightarrow X\times \bar D \rightarrow \bar D$$

In Theorem 4 of the paper, Mori claims that to show $$ \pi^{-1}(D) \cong \mathbb{P}^1 \times D, $$ it is enough to show that "$F|_U$ is an immersion for some open set $U$ of $\mathbb{P}^1$ because $F$ is finite."

The remainder of the paragraph then goes on to prove this, but I do not yet understand this claim. Anyone?


Suppose $F\rvert_{U}\colon U \to X \times D$ is an immersion for some open subset $U \subseteq \mathbf{P}^1 \times D$, and denote the image of $\mathbf{P}^1 \times D$ in $X \times D$ by $W$. Then, since $\mathbf{P}^1 \times D$ is normal, the morphism $F$ factors through the normalization $\widetilde{W} \to W$ (see this MathOverflow answer). Now this morphism $\mathbf{P}^1 \times D \to \widetilde{W}$ is finite and birational, and $\widetilde{W}$ is normal, hence $\mathbf{P}^1 \times D \to \widetilde{W}$ is an isomorphism by [Stacks, Tag 0A81]. Thus, denoting $$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} \widetilde{W} @>\subset>> \widetilde{Y}\\ @VVV @VVV\\ W @>\subset>> Y\\ @VVV @VVV\\ X \times D @>\subset>> X \times \overline{D}\\ @VVV @VVV\\ D @>\subset>> \overline{D} \end{CD}$$ we see that $\pi^{-1}(D) \cong \mathbf{P}^1 \times D$.

  • $\begingroup$ If we take $\tilde W$ to be $\tilde Y$, then indeed we have a morphism from $\mathbb{P}^1 \times D$, which is still finite and birational. Note here that we can factor the immersion as an open immersion followed by a closed immersion because $F|_U$ is finite, hence F is birational. (stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01QV) $\endgroup$ – numberjedi May 14 '17 at 15:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your new edit now makes this clear as well. Thanks :) $\endgroup$ – numberjedi May 14 '17 at 15:51
  • $\begingroup$ @numberjedi I think the issue was the word "its", which I have now replaced with something clearer. If we take W to be the image of $\mathbf{P}^1 \times D$, then the factorization works as you say. $\endgroup$ – Takumi Murayama May 14 '17 at 15:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.