1
$\begingroup$

Question: Subsequences of a convergent sequence converge to the same limit as the original sequence.

Please let me know if I am on the right track or if this solution is sufficient.

My Solution:
Let $(a_n)$ be a convergent sequence. Let $\mathcal{E}>0$ be arbitrary.
Since $(a_n)$ is a convergent sequence, then $a_n \rightarrow L$, where $L$ is the limit of $(a_n)$.
This implies that there exists an $N : |a_n -L|<\mathcal{E}$ whenever $n\geq N$

Let $(a_{n_j})$ be a subsequence of $(a_n)$.
Well, $n_j \geq j \geq N$ which implies $n_j \geq N$
So the same $N$ for $(a_n)$ works for the subsequence $(a_{n_j})$ as well.
So there exists an $N : |a_{n_j}-L|<\mathcal{E}$ which implies $(a_{n_j}) \rightarrow L$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Looks almost fine except $n_j\geq n$ $\endgroup$ – Juniven May 12 '17 at 2:21
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I believe I only got a small part of your comment. I must also say that $n_j \geq j \geq N$? $\endgroup$ – James Snell May 12 '17 at 3:12
  • $\begingroup$ That's correct. $\endgroup$ – Juniven May 12 '17 at 3:25
2
$\begingroup$

Given $\epsilon>o$, choose $N\in\Bbb N$ such that if $n\geq N$ then $|a_n-L|<\epsilon$. Therefore, if $j\geq N$ then $n_j\geq j\geq N$ which implies that $n_j\geq N$ and so $|a_{n_j}-L|<\epsilon$. Hence, $$\lim_{j\to\infty}a_{n_j}=L.$$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.