2
$\begingroup$

There's this maths joke, where $i$ says to $π$, "get rational!" while $π$ says to $i$, "get real!" (I like to say that $e$ says to the both of them, "join me, and we will absolutely be one!" (don't forget that $abs(-1) = 1$, and if needed, look at Euler's identity.))

I thought, however, "is $i$ rational?" If not, they're being a hypocrite in the joke above!

Now: more mathematics; less... sociology.

The definition of a rational number, to the best of my knowledge, is a number which can be represented as $$\frac{p}{q}$$ where $p$ and $q$ are both integers (which, as may be the reason I'm asking the question, is a term I don't understand on the purely abstract level (after all, I could make a number system where "0.5" is equal to $1$.)

So then I was thinking, "well, if $i$'s rational, I can represent it like the $\frac{p}{q}$ above. I know that $i = \frac{i}{1}$, but of course, although every rational number can be represented like that, not every number that can be represented like that is rational." So this is where I got stuck. If $i$ and $1$ are integers ($1$ definitely is,) $i$ is rational.

But... is $i$ an integer‽

I'd like to think so, for the sake of the joke, and because my natural gut feelings think so, but I'm really not sure. There's a lot of floating cloudy stuff in my mind saying so, but I'm looking for some solid evidence that says so or otherwise.

Thanks.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ No, $\mathrm{i}$ is not a rational number in the traditional sense (though there is the idea of a Gaussian rational, which includes numbers of the form $a+b \mathrm{i}$ with $a,b \in \mathbb{Q}$, and the Gaussian integers). $\endgroup$ – Morgan Rodgers May 10 '17 at 18:35
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ But "get Gaussian" doesn't work in a joke. $\endgroup$ – Robert Israel May 10 '17 at 18:36
  • $\begingroup$ (FWIW, I've always thought this joke was bad for precisely this reason) $\endgroup$ – Morgan Rodgers May 10 '17 at 18:37
  • $\begingroup$ "Get rational" isn't an idiomatic expression; the joke usually goes "Be rational". $\endgroup$ – Rahul May 10 '17 at 19:08
3
$\begingroup$

As Morgan Rodgers says, $i$ is not an integer. (You are correct that this is a sociological question and not a mathematical one; there is a convention that we agree upon for how to use the word "integer" and the convention is that the integers are the numbers $0, 1, -1, 2, -2, 3, -3, \dots$.) Instead it is what is called a Gaussian integer.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So... does that make $i$ a... Gaussian rational or something? $\endgroup$ – Tachytaenius May 11 '17 at 10:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, that's right. Gaussian rationals are numbers that can be written as a ratio of Gaussian integers. They form what is called a number field, and these sorts of things are studied in algebraic number theory. $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan May 11 '17 at 17:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.