0
$\begingroup$

Let $V$ be a vector over a field and $V_1, V_2$ are linear subspaces of V.

$$(V_1 \cap V_2)^{0}=V_1^0+V_2^0$$

is what I'm supposed to show, but I do not believe this to be true. Let's assume $V_1\neq V_2$ and then we can find w.l.o.g a $v_1 \in V_1$ that's not in $V_2$.

Let then $\psi \in (V_1 \cap V_2)^{0} = \{ \psi \in V^{*}| \psi(v)=0 \quad \forall v\in V_1 \cap V_2 \}$. $\psi(v_1)$ is not necessarily 0, since $\psi$ only has to be zero for vectors in the intersection. But surely $\psi$ has to fullfill that condition to be an element of $ V_1^0+V_2^0$ since that is the very definition of all the elements of $V_1^0$. Hence, the sets are not necessarily equal.

Where is my mistake? As this is a book exercise I'm quite sure it's true, so I'd appreciate somebody convincing me of the hypothesis

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $\psi\left(v_1\right)$ is not necessarily $0$, but it could be $0$. Also, there exists $\phi\in V_1^0+V_2^0$ such that $\phi\left(v_1\right)=0$, but not all of them satisfy this. Hence your argument does not hold. $\endgroup$ – Guy May 10 '17 at 16:34
  • $\begingroup$ I phrased that wrongly, I edited it. But still I can't see how an element of $(V_1 \cap V_2)^{0}$ needs to be in $V_1^0+V_2^0$ $\endgroup$ – Jonathan May 10 '17 at 16:36
  • $\begingroup$ Related : math.stackexchange.com/questions/2161177/u-cap-w0-u0-w0. $\endgroup$ – Arnaud D. May 10 '17 at 16:37
  • $\begingroup$ Also : $V^0_1+V_2^0$ is larger than $V^0_1$, so even if $\psi(v_1)\neq 0$, it can still be in $V^0_1+V_2^0$. $\endgroup$ – Arnaud D. May 10 '17 at 16:40
  • $\begingroup$ Okay, I see the mistake. I was able to prove the other inclusion now, but I'm still stuck on the first one! $\endgroup$ – Jonathan May 10 '17 at 16:49
1
$\begingroup$

Here's a proof of the forward inclusion that works for infinite dimensional $V$.

Let $B_{1,2}$ be a basis of $V_1 \cap V_2$. Since $V_1 \cap V_2$ is a subspace both of $V_1$ and of $V_2$, we can (assuming choice) extend this basis both to a basis $B_1$ of $V_1$ and a basis $B_2$ of $V_2$. Moreover the union $B_1 \cup B_2$ is linearly independent (easily verified). This means that $B_1 \cup B_2$ can be extended to a basis $B$ of $V$.

With this framework established, we let $\psi \in (V_1 \cap V_2)^0$ arbitrary.
We'll define $\psi_1$ and $\psi_2$ by their actions on the basis $B$ of $V$ so that

  • $\psi_1 \in V_1^0$
  • $\psi_2 \in V_2^0$
  • $\psi = \psi_1 + \psi_2$

For any $b \in B$, define:

$$\psi_1(b) = \begin{cases} 0 & b \in B_1 \\ \psi(b) & \text{else} \end{cases} \\ \psi_2(b) = \begin{cases} \psi(b) & b \in B_1 \setminus B_{1,2} \\ 0 & \text{else} \end{cases} $$

From these definitions $\psi_1$ clearly annihilates the basis of $B_1$ of $V_1$, and since $(B_1 \setminus B_{1,2}) \cap B_2 = \emptyset$, $\psi_2$ annihilates the basis $B_2$ of $V_2$.

Furthermore we have the following breakdown of $\psi_{1} + \psi_2$:

$$\psi_1(b) + \psi_2(b) = \begin{cases} 0 + 0 & b \in B_{1,2} \\ 0 + \psi(b) & b \in B_1 \setminus B_{1,2} \\ \psi(b) + 0 & \text{else} \end{cases} $$

Thus the desired decomposition of $\psi$ into the sum of annihilators of $V_1$ and $V_2$ does exist, showing the inclusion $(V_1 \cap V_2)^0 \subset V_1^0 + V_2^0$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.