3
$\begingroup$

For a Hilbert space $H$, and a linear operator $T:H\to H$, I've seen the trace of $T$ defined as $\sum_k<Te_k,e_k>$ (where $\{e_k\}$ is any orthonormal basis) provided this is finite.

How does this generalize the finite dimensional case? I see how this would generalize for self-adjoint operators (or normal on complex hilbert spaces) since these operators are unitarily diagonalizable. But what about a general linear operator on a finite dimensional space?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you give the definition of the trace of a general linear operator on a finite dimensional space you want to use? $\endgroup$ – Dirk May 10 '17 at 9:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You might be interested in the following: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%E2%80%93Schmidt_operator Also I think your question is how to generalize it to the infinite-dimensional setting, it says finite for the moment. $\endgroup$ – Mathematician 42 May 10 '17 at 9:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No need for diagonalisability. Consider the matrix of $T$ with respect to the basis $\langle e_1, e_2, \dotsc, e_{\dim H}\rangle$. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer May 10 '17 at 9:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Bemte sum of complex eigenvalues $\endgroup$ – Tom Chalmer May 10 '17 at 9:38
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielFischer Ah, ok I understand. Thank you. $\endgroup$ – Tom Chalmer May 10 '17 at 9:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.