In my study of QFT I've faced the following PDE in Peskin&Schroeder textbook:

$$\frac{\partial^2 g(x,\xi)}{\partial w \partial \xi}=A g(x,\xi),$$

where $w=\ln(1/x)$ and $A$ is a constant.

The book provides a solution only in the limit $w\xi\gg1$ for some reason.


where $\xi=\ln \ln \left(Q^2\right)$, and $K(Q^2)$ is a function determined from initial condition.

So, my questions are:

  1. Why dont they use separation of variables for this PDE?
  2. Is there any method to obtain general solution? Or can you explain how they get this approximate form?
  • $\begingroup$ Have you tried to separate the variables for this PDE? My guess is that it may not work and that's why they did not do so. $\endgroup$ – Paichu May 6 '17 at 22:13

The method of separation of variables could be used as shown below: $$\frac{\partial^2 g(x,\xi)}{\partial w \partial \xi}=A g(x,\xi),$$ where $w=\ln(1/x) \quad\to\quad dw=-\frac{1}{x}dx\quad\to\quad \frac{\partial g}{\partial w}=\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}\frac{dx}{dw}=-x\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}$

$$-x\frac{\partial^2 g(x,\xi)}{\partial x \partial \xi}=Ag(x,\xi),$$ $g=F(x)G(\xi) \quad\to\quad -x\frac{F'}{F}\frac{G'}{G}=A \quad\to\quad \begin{cases} -x\frac{F'}{F}=\lambda \quad\to\quad F=x^{-\lambda} \\ \frac{G'}{G}=\frac{A}{\lambda} \quad\to\quad G=e^{A\xi/\lambda} \end{cases}$

This leads to a family of particular solutions of the PDE : $\quad g_{\lambda}(x,\xi)=C_\lambda e^{A\xi/\lambda}x^{-\lambda}$

Combining all these particular solutions leads to a general form expressing the solution of the PDE: $$g(x,\xi)=\int\Phi(\lambda) e^{A\xi/\lambda}x^{-\lambda}d\lambda =\int\Phi(\lambda) e^{A\xi/\lambda-\lambda\ln{x}} d\lambda $$ $$g(x,\xi)=\int\Phi(\lambda) e^{\frac{A}{\lambda}\xi+\lambda w} d\lambda $$ with any function $\Phi$ insofar the integral be convergent. This function $\Phi$ has to be determined according to the boundary conditions. Generally that is the most difficult part of the job, depending a lot of what are the boundary conditions.

To the question : 1.Why don't they use separation of variables for this PDE? , the answer might be : Because this form of function to express the PDE solution is complicated and not easy to approximate according to the context of the problem.

You wrote : "The book provides a solution only in the limit $w\xi≫1$ for some reason". Moreover, the boundary conditions are not explicitly given. All this makes difficult to derive an approximate from the above general formula. That is probably why a simpler approach (may be for didactic reason) was investigated and then presented in the book.


For $A=1$ ,

According to Method of charactersitics and second order PDE.,

The general solution is $g(x,\xi)=\int_0^xf(s)I_0\left(2\sqrt{\xi(x-s)}\right)~ds+\int_0^\xi g(s)I_0\left(2\sqrt{x(\xi-s)}\right)~ds$

And I think for other values of $A$ , the form of general solutions are similar.

Note that using separation of variables for this PDE cannot work well for deduce its general solution, because:

Let $g(x,\xi)=X(x)\Xi(\xi)$ ,

Then $X'(x)\Xi'(\xi)=AX(x)\Xi(\xi)$




$\therefore g(x,\xi)=\int_sc(s)e^{xs+\frac{A\xi}{s}}~ds$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.