5
$\begingroup$

First, I will set the scene: suppose $M$ is a compact connected smooth manifold equipped with a Riemannian metric. The Hopf-Rinow theorem guarantees that any two points $x,y\in M$ can be joined by a geodesic, and of all the geodesics joining $x$ and $y$, at least one is a shortest path from $x$ to $y$.

Now here is what I am trying to prove. Let $p\in M$. I want to show that there is a neighborhood $U$ of $p$ such that if $x,y\in U$, I can extend a shortest-path geodesic from $x$ to $y$ to a third point $z$ so that the path is also a shortest path from $x$ to $z$. The Hopf-Rinow theorem guarantees that the geodesic from $x$ to $y$ can be extended past $y$, but how can I guarantee that the geodesic continues being the shortest path for even just a little bit?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not too sure if this leads to a relevant conclusion, but Bellman's Principle of Optimality asserts that if the optimal path from $x$ to $y$ is $\gamma$, then the optimal path from $x$ to any other point on $\gamma$ between $x$ and $y$ is also along $\gamma$. Combining this with the Hopf-Rinow theorem may lead to the conclusion that all extensions of $\gamma$ are also optimal to the new endpoint, but I'm not too sure. $\endgroup$ – jnez71 May 6 '17 at 17:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Unfortunately, no. If $x$ and $y$ are antipodal points on a sphere, there are lots of minimal geodesics from $x$ to $y$, but which ever one you would like to extend does not extend to an optimal path to a third point. $\endgroup$ – Alex S May 6 '17 at 17:16
  • $\begingroup$ Well the optimal path would still be "on" that geodesic, just if you go the other way around haha :P I see what you're saying, although that could be due to the fact that there are multiple (nonetheless infinite) optimal paths, so Bellman's principle would have to behave a bit differently. Can you think of another counterexample but where there is only one minimal geodesic from $x$ to $y$? Maybe uniqueness is key to the guarantee you seek? $\endgroup$ – jnez71 May 6 '17 at 18:19
4
$\begingroup$

This is, e.g., a consequence of the fact that the injectivity radius (see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut_locus_(Riemannian_manifold)) of a compact smooth manifold is bounded from below (it's upper semicontinuous, see, e.g. here: The continuity of injectivity radius, but you'll find this also in textbooks about differential geometry). If you look at a neighbourhood of a point $p$ of the form $$\{\exp_p(tv): 0\le t \le r_i(p),\, v\in T_pM, ||v||= 1)$$ with $r_i(p)$ being the injectivity radius of $M$ in $p$, then any geodesic starting in $p$ with length less than $r_i(p)$ will be minimizing.

You just have to make your neighbourhood $U$ small enough to get the result you want.

The pertinent concept is (strong) geodesic convexity.

References are, for example, Cheeger-Ebin, Comparison theorems in Riemannian Geometry, or Klingenbergs 'Riemannian Geometry' (and many other textbooks).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is eventually solved it too. I just forgot to answer my own question. $\endgroup$ – Alex S Mar 15 '18 at 19:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.