2
$\begingroup$

In it's form as a covariant 4 tensor field the symmetries of the curvature tensor are given by

$$R_{ijkl}=-R_{jikl}$$ $$R_{ijkl}=-R_{ijlk}$$ $$R_{ijkl}=R_{klij}$$ $$R_{ijkl}+R_{jkil}+R_{kijl}=0$$

Can we recast these in terms of the definition of the curvature as a (3,1) tensor? It would seem to me that the first symmetry implies

$$R_{ijk}^{\ell}=-R_{jik}^{\ell}$$

Is this correct? What about recasting the remaining 3? Is it possible and if so how?

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

Note that $R_{ijk}^{\;\;\; l} = R_{ijkm}g^{ml}$. So we have

$$R_{ijk}^{\;\;\; l} = R_{ijkm}g^{ml} = -R_{jikm}g^{ml} = -R_{jik}^{\;\;\;l}.$$

For the second identity, we have

$$R_{ijk}^{\;\;\; l} = R_{ijkm}g^{ml} = - R_{ijmk}g^{ml} = -R_{ij\; k}^{\;\; l}.$$

For the third, we have

$$R_{ijk}^{\;\;\; l} = R_{ijkm}g^{ml} = R_{kmij}g^{ml} = R_{k\; ij}^{\; l}.$$

Finally, we have

\begin{align*} R_{ijk}^{\;\;\; l} + R_{jki}^{\;\;\; l} + R_{kij}^{\;\;\; l} &= R_{ijkm}g^{ml} + R_{jkim}g^{ml} + R_{kijm}g^{ml}\\ &= (R_{ijkm} + R_{jkim} + R_{kijm})g^{ml}\\ &= 0g^{ml}\\ &= 0. \end{align*}

The take away is that if the identity involves permuting the indicies $i$, $j$, and $k$ only, then it holds for the $(3, 1)$-tensor too. If the identity involves permuting $l$ as well, then the position of the raised index changes.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.