1
$\begingroup$

This question is follow up to an interesting question I found here.

The results of this question states the following:

If $U$ is a domain, and $f,g$ are two real-analytic functions defined on $U$, and if $V\subset U$ is a nonempty open set with $f\lvert_V \equiv g\lvert_V$, then $f \equiv g$. If the domain is one-dimensional (an interval in $\mathbb{R}$), then it suffices that $f\lvert_M \equiv g\lvert_M$ for some $M\subset U$ that has an accumulation point in $U$.

I have a few question about this theorem:

  1. I was looking for a reference for this. However, in the previously pointed out reference A Primer of Real Analytic Functions by Krantz and Parks, I was not able to locate this theorem. I would appriciate if someone could point me to proper reference of this theorem.
  2. My main question, is about the second part of the theorem. Specifically, I am interested in why there is such a difference going from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}^n$. That is in one-dimension we can assume that $M$ is just a set with an accumulation point, but in $\mathbb{R}^n$ we have to assume that $M$ is an open set. I would really like see a counter example that demonstraes that assuming that $M$ is a set with accumulation points is not sufficient in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
  3. I would really like for you to speculate or suggest an extra assumptions on functions $f$ and $g$ such that it suffices to consider $M$ to be only a set with an accumulation point.
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ As for your question (2): You could take a set $M$ with an accumulation such that every point of $M$ is colinear. What could this possibly tell you about how the function behaves in a perpendicular dimension? You could add multiples of $y, y^2$ (say), and not affect $f|_M$. $\endgroup$ – Joppy May 1 '17 at 14:44
4
$\begingroup$

$M$ being open is not a necessary condition for $M$ to be a uniqueness set in higher dimensions. For example, if $f,g$ are real analytic on $\mathbb R^2$ and $f = g$ on $\cup_{k=1}^\infty \{(x,y):x=1/k\},$ then $f\equiv g.$ Also any set of positive measure, in any dimension, will give the result.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You mentioned that $f$ and $g$ agree on a set of a positive measure then they agree everywhere. Does this set have to be connected? For example, if $f$ and $g$ agree on a fat Cantor set which has a positive measure do they agree everywhere? $\endgroup$ – Boby May 4 '17 at 12:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Boby Any set of positive measure will work, including your fat Cantor set. $\endgroup$ – zhw. May 4 '17 at 15:07
  • $\begingroup$ Could you point me to the reference on this? Would greatly appreciate it. $\endgroup$ – Boby May 4 '17 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ @Boby I don't really know of a reference. For $\mathbb R$ it's simple: Suppose $E\subset \mathbb R$ has positive measure. Then $E$ is uncountable. Therefore $E\cap [-a,a]$ is infinite for some $a>0.$ Hence $E$ has a limit point. By the usual result in one variable, $E$ is a uniqueness set for real analytic functions. continued below ... $\endgroup$ – zhw. May 4 '17 at 16:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Suppose now $E\subset \mathbb R^2$ has positive two-dimensional Lebegue measure. By Fubini, $$m_2(E) = \int_{\mathbb R} \int_{\mathbb R} m_1(E\cap ( \{x\}\times \mathbb R))\, dm_1(y) \, dm_1(x).$$See if you can get the two dimensional result from this and the one-dimensional result. This points the way to a general inductive proof based on the dimension. $\endgroup$ – zhw. May 4 '17 at 16:22
2
$\begingroup$

For 2 and 3: the functions $0$ and $x$ are a counterexample if all you want is an accumulation, and since a general analytic function will have an $n-1$ dimensional $0$ set, the best you can do is what Mark van Leeuwen suggests here.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ok. I see now how these are counter examples. I see that the reference that you pointed out is related. But can I explain more in the context of this question. Specifically, commenting on the $\mathbb{R}^n$. $\endgroup$ – Boby May 1 '17 at 14:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.