# Isosceles right triangle sides

I need to find a reasonable length sides for 3D printing an isosceles right triangle. So basically if the formula goes something like this:

Right triangle Pythagorus theorem gives us:

x^2 + y^2 = z^2 (z being the hypotenuse)

Since this is an isosceles triangle:

2 * x^2 = z^2

and z = x * sqrt(2)

My question is how do I find z and x for my needs? And by reasonable I mean:

1. Not very large (in the order of 10s or 100s and maybe even 1000s)
2. Whole numbers or two decimal point precision)

Or is that not a thing? Thanks in advance!

• There are no solutions with rational $x,z$ to $2x^2=z^2.$ So even using some specific (limited) number of decimals what you look for doesn't exist. – coffeemath Apr 29 '17 at 23:22
• Thank you @coffeemath for the input; I was wondering if I was missing something simple but seems I was not. – Anand Apr 29 '17 at 23:34

Nice approximations come from solutions to Pell's equation $x^2-2y^2=1$ and the closely related $x^2-2y^2=-1$. We can note that $x=1, y=1$ is a solution to the second. Because of this solution and Brahmagupta's identity if you have a solution $(a,b)$ to one of them, $(a+2b,a+b)$ will be a solution to the other. Each successive solution will have the ratio of the two numbers a closer approximation to $\sqrt 2$ because the $1$ in the equation is smaller and smaller compared to $x^2,y^2$. The solutions will also alternate between being above $\sqrt 2$ (when the left side is $1$) and below $\sqrt 2$. The approximations are $\frac 11=1, \frac 32=1.5, \frac 75=1.4, \frac {17}{12}\approx 1.4167, \frac {41}{29} \approx 1.4138$ and so on. The last is rather close.
• The basic idea is if you can't solve $x^2-2y^2=0$ in the integers, take the next smallest thing available for the right side and see if it works. You can replace the $2$ by any non-square and the equation is solvable with $1$ on the right. It may or may not be with $-1$ on the right. The smallest solution can be rather large. This is also related to the continued fraction for $\sqrt 2$. This is an area I have never studied formally, so my knowledge is spotty. – Ross Millikan Apr 29 '17 at 23:51