2
$\begingroup$

I recently asked a question in my mathematical physics class: In complex manifolds, why don't we combine the real part of one variable with the imaginary part of the other variable to obtain more general CR-equations? My lectures mentioned something about conformal manifolds. But I didn't understand quite what he was talking about. Could you please refer me to literature which deals with the question that I put? I haven't read any literature on Functions of Several Complex Variables, but I could imagine that they the CR equations could look something like this: $$\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_i}=\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_j}$$ $$\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_i}=-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_j}$$ where i and j are natural numbers and run from 1 to dimension of the complex space.

thank you

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What exactly are you proposing (write the equations you have in mind)? $\endgroup$ – Moishe Kohan Apr 29 '17 at 10:17
  • $\begingroup$ @MoisheCohen I edited the question. $\endgroup$ – eeqesri Apr 30 '17 at 7:57
  • $\begingroup$ Your equation is more or less the general CR equation (where you should have $i=j$ and $z_i = x_i + \sqrt{-1} y_i$ are the complex coordinates). $\endgroup$ – user99914 Apr 30 '17 at 8:01
  • $\begingroup$ I know that usually i=j. but the whole point is that why should we consider only the case where i=j? Why not combine the real and imaginary parts of different complex variables? $\endgroup$ – eeqesri Apr 30 '17 at 16:33
  • $\begingroup$ It is not exactly clear what you are proposing: Are you asking what happens if you have these equations for all $i, j$ or only for some $i, j$? If you mean, for all $i, j$ then your function simply becomes a holomorphic function of the form $f(z, z + a_2, z+ a_3,..., z+ a_n)$ for some complex numbers $a_2,..., a_n$. $\endgroup$ – Moishe Kohan May 1 '17 at 2:35
0
$\begingroup$

Choose your favorite complex manifold. In differential geometry, there is often a source manifold (call it a domain if you like) and a target manifold (call it the image of the pre-image domain, or if you like, the range of a map from a source to target). Conformal simply means angles in the pre-image of the map are preserved in the target under the conformal map.

I found Theodore W. Gamelin, "Complex Analysis," Springer, 2001, page 59 helpful as it illustrates with a picture a conformal map.

For the most part, I believe John Ma is giving you good advice.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.