2
$\begingroup$

I am trying to remember the equation for the laplacian in polar coordinates: $$ \Delta u=u_{rr}+\frac{u_r}{r}+\frac{u_{\theta \theta}}{r^2} $$ without having to derive it everytime and hopefully gain some intuition in the process.

I am also hoping to get some understanding for the formula in $\mathbb{R}^n$ in hyperspherical coordinates: $$ \Delta u=u_{rr}+\frac{(n-1)u_r}{r}+\frac{\Delta_s u}{r^2} $$ where the $\Delta_su$ represents the laplace beltrami operator, which only depends on angular coordinates and which I definitely do not want to derive, ever.

When this was introduced in my PDE class, the professor drew a circle on the board with a tangential vector and talked about a correction term on the order of $r^2$ from traveling along the circle vs this tangential vector. No one really got what he meant, and maybe it is unclear. Anyway, I a mostly looking for some intuition of this kind for why this expression makes sense.

I would be happy to learn about the polar version but definitely would be happy if someone can shed light on the n dimensional one as well. Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The "physical" intuition is that the terms must have same dimension (in physics sense , $\dfrac{1}{length^2}$, and the angle is dimensionless. $\endgroup$ – user58697 Apr 23 '17 at 20:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user58697 that's quite helpful for remembering! thanks for the comment $\endgroup$ – qbert Apr 23 '17 at 20:30
4
$\begingroup$

This answer explains what I'm guessing the "correction term" was about.

Consider the point $(r,0)$ at the rightmost extent of the circle - this is no loss of generality since you can just rotate your coordinate system. We want a formula for $\Delta u = u_{xx} + u_{yy}$ in terms of radial and angular coordinates. At this point the radial direction is horizontal, so we have $u_{rr} = u_{xx}$, and thus the hard part is relating $u_{yy}$ (the second derivative along the tangent line $x = r$ at this point) to $u_{\theta \theta}$ (the second derivative along the circle at this point).

Since the equation of the circle is $\gamma(\theta) = r (\cos \theta, \sin \theta)$, we can get the desired formula by differentiating the composition $(u\circ \gamma)(\theta) = u(r \cos \theta, r \sin \theta)$.

The first derivative is (using the chain rule)

$$ u_\theta =-u_xr\sin\theta+u_yr\cos\theta.$$ Now, differentiate this again (using the chain and product rules) and substitute $\theta = 0$ (since we are interested in the point $(r,0)$) to get

$$ u_{\theta \theta}|_{\theta =0} = -ru_x + r^2 u_{yy} = -ru_r + r^2u_{yy}.$$

Thus we have $$u_{yy} = \frac 1{r^2} u_{\theta \theta} + \frac 1 r u_r$$ as desired.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ this is excellent and certainly what was meant. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – qbert Apr 24 '17 at 1:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.