We are faced here with algorithmic issues at a very low discrepancy level, this discrepancy being rendered by a "contour plot".
On the LHS, $x^2+y^2$ is computed in a certain way, hopefully as $x*x+y*y$ (but that's not sure), and, on the RHS, in a different way, for example $r^2$=norm of vector $(x,y)$ obtained by another algorithm, or the same algorithm with a different rounding level. The contour plot is a graphical representation of their difference, a noisy plane surface $z=\varepsilon(x,y)$ (at a very very low level of noise).
I have written a Matlab program that reproduces the upsaid type of discrepancy and gives a result that if very similar to the type of graphics given in the question (see the central instruction "T(K,L)=norm($[x,y])^2-(x^2+y^2)$;").

pas=0.01;
for K=1:100;
x=-0.5+K*pas;
for L=1:100;
y=-0.5+L*pas;
T(K,L)=norm([x,y])^2-(x^2+y^2);
end;
end;
contour(T)
Remarks:
a) The maximum discrepancy value $|T(K,L)|$ is $1.7 \times 10^{-16}.$ Take note that we are under the Matlab's "machine epsilon" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_epsilon) which is $2.2 \times 10^{-16}.$
b) One can notice as well a certain symmetry in the vicinity of axes, looking a little like a Rorschach test.
c) A specificity of Matlab is that there is still another function equivalent to function norm : it is $hypot$ with hypot(x,y), closer to $x^2+y^2$ in the mean.