Fourier Series

So in my book we are talking about Fourier Series. $$f(x) = \frac{1}{2}a_0+\sum_{n=1}^\infty\left[a_n\sin{\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right)}+b_n\cos{\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right)}\right]$$ It says the represents "fairly nice" periodic functions of period $L$.

Sturm Liouville Problem

A sturm liouville problem is one where $$(p(x)y')'+q(x)y+\lambda w(x)y=0 \qquad p(x),w(x)>0 \qquad \text{on} \qquad x_0 \leq x \leq x_1$$ with Boundary Conditions that allow self-adjointness i.e. Dirichlet, Neumann, Singular POint, Periodic or Radiation.

Solution of Sturm Liouville Problem

When solving the SL problem, we normally look at three different values for $\lambda$ ($0,>0,<0$), find the eigenvalues (which are all positive and real), find the eigenfunctions (which are all real) and so if I pick any eigenvalue and its respective eigenfunction, that is a solution to the SL problem (i.e. the Differential Equation with those eigenvalues substituted to lambda has a solution, the eigenfunction, that respects the Boundary Conditions).

Connection between the two

My book then briefly says that "$\sin{\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right)}$ and $\cos{\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right)}$ are eigenfunctions of the SL problem $y''+\lambda y=0$ on $[-L,L]$ with periodic BCs. And that $$\left\{1, \sin{\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right)}, \cos{\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right)}\right\}$$ form an orthogonal basis for the space of $2L$ -periodic "nice" functions."

My trial

So I tried, using $w(x)=1$, $q(x)=0$, $p(x)=1$, on $[-L,L]$ with $y(-L)=y(L)$ and $y'(-L)=y'(L)$

  1. $\lambda =0$ gives $y=Ax+B$ and applying the conditions gives $A=0$. However doesn't tell us anything about B.
  2. $\lambda=-\mu^2$ ($\mu\neq 0$) gives $y=Ae^{\mu x}+Be^{-\mu x}$ and applying the conditions gives only the trivial solution $y\equiv 0$
  3. $\lambda=\mu^2$ ($\mu\neq 0$) gives $y =A\sin{(\mu x)}+B\cos{(\mu x)}$ and applying the conditions gives$\mu=\frac{n\pi}{L}$ only.

However I don't know how to continue to connect the two. I got another solution from the case $\lambda =0$, how do I unify everything?

But in general my question is

What is the connection between fourier series and SL problems? How can I show that sin and cos are eigenfunctions of that particular sturm liouville problem? And finally, if that is the case, what are the sturm-liouville's problems associated with sine fourier series and cosine fourier series?

  • $\begingroup$ If you have doubts about $B$ as an additional or another solution to SL problem, think about this: it doesn't really matter whether you use $1$ or $B$ as this solution. When you use it in linear combination, you multiply it by some constant $K$. So $K\cdot B$ gives the same contribution into linear combination as $(KB) \cdot 1$. So, it's not really a different solution. $\endgroup$ – Evgeny Apr 18 '17 at 19:11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ And since the differential equation is linear, and we know that $A \cos(\frac{n\pi x}{L}) + B \sin(\frac{n\pi x}{L})$ is an eigenfunction then so are $\cos(\frac{n\pi x}{L})$ and $\sin(\frac{n\pi x}{L})$. $\endgroup$ – Martin Apr 18 '17 at 19:44
  • $\begingroup$ You have found eigenfunctions $1$, $\sin(n\pi x/L)$ and $\cos(n\pi x/L)$ for $n=1,2,3,\cdots$. An equivalent set of eigenfunctions is $e^{in\pi x/L}$ for $n=0,\pm 1,\pm 2,\cdots$. So you have the correct solutions (non-zero scalar multiplies don't change anything.) $\endgroup$ – Disintegrating By Parts Apr 19 '17 at 13:28
  • $\begingroup$ @Evgeny Okay it kind of makes sense. But how would I have to write down the solution for the sturm liouville problem? So for example, if I had to answer "what is the set of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues that solve $y''+\lambda y=0$ with periodic boundary conditions on $[-L,L]$?" would I have to write down $\lambda_n = \left(\frac{n\pi}{L}\right)^2$ for $n=1,2,3,..$ and $y_n=A_n\sin{(\sqrt{\lambda_n}x)}+B_n\cos{(\sqrt{\lambda_n}x)}$ for $n=0,1,2,3..$ or what? More importantly, should they start at $n=0$ or $n=1$? It is so confusing $\endgroup$ – Euler_Salter Apr 19 '17 at 13:52
  • $\begingroup$ @Martin okay yes it makes sense, I could just pick $A=1, B=0$ for the cosine and $A=0, B=1$ for the sine right? $\endgroup$ – Euler_Salter Apr 19 '17 at 13:54

Let $L$ be the operator $Lf=-f''$ defined on the domain $\mathcal{D}(L)$ consisting of twice absolutely continuous functions $f$ on $[-\pi,\pi]$ that satisfy periodic conditions $f(-\pi)=f(\pi)$ and $f'(-\pi)=f'(\pi)$. Then $L$ is symmetric on its domain because, for $f,g\in \mathcal{D}(L)$, one has $$ (Lf,g)-(f,Lg) = \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(t)\overline{g''(t)}-f''(t)\overline{g(t)}dt \\ = \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\frac{d}{dt}\{f(t)\overline{g'(t)}-f'(t)\overline{g(t)}\}dt \\ = \left.\{f(t)\overline{g'(t)}-f'(t)\overline{g(t)}\}\right|_{t=-\pi}^{\pi}=0. $$ Therefore, if $Lf=\lambda f$ and $f\ne 0$, it follows that $\lambda$ is real because $$ (\lambda-\overline{\lambda})(f,f)=(Lf,f)-(f,Lf) = 0. $$ Likewise if $f,g$ are not identically $0$ and $Lf=\lambda f$, $Lg=\mu g$ with $\lambda\ne \mu$, then $(f,g)=0$ because $$ (\lambda-\mu)(f,g) = (Lf,g)-(f,Lg) = 0. $$ Note that $L1 = \lambda 1$ where $\lambda=0$. This makes sense because the constant function $1$ is in the domain of $L$, as it is twice absolutely continuous, and it is periodic in the the function and its first derivative. And, $$ L\sin(nx) = n^2 \sin(nx),\;\; L\cos(nx)=n^2\cos(nx). $$ So, $\lambda_n = n^2$ are eigenvalues for $n=0,1,2,\cdots$. The eigenspace $\{ 1\}$ for $\lambda=0$ is one-dimensional. The eigenspace $\{\sin(nx),\cos(nx)\}$ is two-dimensional with eigenvalue $\lambda_n=n^2$. There is latitude on how you choose the elements of $E_n$ for $n \ne 0$, but it is convenient to choose an orthogonal basis, which is what choosing $\sin(nx),\cos(nx)$ does. You could instead choose $\{ e^{inx},e^{-inx}\}$, which is also an orthogonal basis. Or you could choose $\{ e^{inx},\cos(nx) \}$, which is not an orthogonal basis for the two-dimensional eigenspace, even though it is a basis.

The standard Fourier basis is $\{ 1,\cos(x),\sin(x),\cos(2x),\sin(2x),\cdots\}$ which consists of orthogonal real functions. To expand $f \in L^2[-\pi,\pi]$ in such a basis, $$ f \sim a_0 1 + a_1 \cos(x)+ b_1 \sin(x) + a_2 \cos(2x)+ b_2\sin(2x) + \cdots, $$ one formally takes the dot product of $f$ with one of the basis elements as well as the series on the right. Using orthogonality, $$ (f,1) = a_0(1,1), \;\;\; a_0 = \frac{(f,1)}{(1,1)} \\ (f,\cos(nx)) = a_n (\cos(nx),\cos(nx)),\;\;\; a_n = \frac{(f,\cos(nx))}{(\cos(nx),\cos(nx))} \\ (f,\sin(nx)) = b_n (\sin(nx),\sin(nx)),\;\;\; b_n = \frac{(f,\sin(nx))}{(\sin(nx),\sin(nx))}. $$ Using $(1,1)=2\pi$ and $(\cos(nx),\cos(nx))=\pi$, $(\sin(nx),\sin(nx))=\pi$ gives the Fourier series expansion: $$ f \sim \frac{1}{2\pi}(f,1) + \frac{1}{\pi}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\{(f,\cos(nx))\cos(nx)+(f,\sin(nx))\sin(nx)\} \\ \sim \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(t)dt + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(t)\sin(nt)dt\sin(nx)+\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(t)\cos(nt)dt\cos(nx). $$

Note: The integral orthogonality did not come from such arguments. The "orthogonality" property of the trigonometric functions was an experimentally discovered fact when trying to write an initial condition for a vibrating string problem in terms of travelling waves. This predated Fourier's work, finite-dimensional linear algebra, eigenfunction analaysis, etc., by decades.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.