3
$\begingroup$

Let $\left\{\mathbb{F}_{p^n}| n \in \mathbb{N}\right\}$ be a family of finite fields of characteristic $p$. Whenever $m$ divides $n$, we have the inclusion homomorphism $\mathbb{F}_{p^m} \to \mathbb{F}_{p^n}$. We also have the surjection $\mathbb{F}_{p^n} \to \mathbb{F}_{p^m}$ given by the norm map. This gives us two limits:

$$I = \lim_{\leftarrow} \mathbb{F}_{p^n}$$ $$D = \lim_{\rightarrow} \mathbb{F}_{p^n}$$

Now, I think both $I$ and $D$ are algebraically closed fields containing $\mathbb{F}_p$ - they're both characteristic $p$ and for every irreducible polynomial $f(x) \in \mathbb{F}_p[x]$ all it's roots are contained in $\mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ for some $n$, right? My question is, are they both THE algebraic closure of $\mathbb{F}_p$? I think an explicit isomorphism can be constructed using the universal property of direct and inverse limits, but I'm not sure how.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe by identifying every element in $\bar{\mathbb{F}_p}$ with it's image on it's splitting field $\mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ over $\mathbb{F}_p$, but then each limit would give me a homomorphism on only one direction. Is an inverse function obvious, or is it direct to show that each given homomorphism is bijective? $\endgroup$ – Henrique Augusto Souza Apr 17 '17 at 13:59
4
$\begingroup$

$I$ is not a field, or indeed a ring, since the norm maps are not ring homomorphisms.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, I see, I was making a confusion - I was thinking about the map $x \mapsto x^{p^m}$. That one is indeed a ring homomorphism, but it's image is not contained in $\mathbb{F}_{p^m}$, it only fixes the elements of $\mathbb{F}_{p^m}$. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Henrique Augusto Souza Apr 17 '17 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ But the direct limit is indeed isomorphic to the algebraic closure, right? $\endgroup$ – Henrique Augusto Souza Apr 17 '17 at 14:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, $D$ is an algebraic closure of $\Bbb F_p$. $\endgroup$ – Lord Shark the Unknown Apr 17 '17 at 14:03
2
$\begingroup$

@Lord Shark the Unknown, for information: it is true that the inverse limit of fields w.r.t. norms in general is not a field because the norm maps do not respect addition. However, in a very special - and very important - case, one can put a field structure on that limit. This is the construction of the so called "field of norms" of Fontaine and Wintenberger (*) around the 80's, which allowed a decisive breakthrough in the theory of $p$-adic Galois representations. Let me try to summarize that construction, which could perhaps be given as an exam problem on local fields.

One starts with a fixed prime $p$ and a local field $K$ with perfect residue field of characteristic $p$. Consider an infinite extension $L/K$ which is "arithmetically profinite", APF for short. For the precise definition of APF, see (*). Suffice it to say that a totally ramified Galois extension whose Galois group is a $p$-adic Lie group (e.g., ($\mathbf Z_p , +$)) is APF. The "field of norms" $X_K (L)= X(L/K)^* \cup$ {0} associated to an APF extension $L/K$ is a local field of characteristic $p$ which is constructed as follows. Its multiplicative group $X(L/K)^*$ is just the inverse limit w.r.t. norms of the multiplicative groups of the finite subextensions of $L/K$.

The main problem is to define addition in $X_K (L)$. For convenience, denote by $\mathcal E_{L/K}$ the filtered ordered set of finite subextensions of $L/K$. Let $K_0$ and $K_1$ resp. be the maximal unramified and tamely ramified subextensions of $L/K$ (which belong to $\mathcal E_{L/K}$). Let us define a valuation on $X_K (L)$. If $\alpha=(\alpha_E) \in X_K (L)$, $v_E(\alpha_E)$ for $E\in \mathcal E_{L/K}$ does not depend on $E$ and we can define $v(\alpha)=v_E(\alpha_E)$. Besides, for $x\in k_L$, the residue field of $L$, let $[x]$ the multiplicative representative of $x$ in $K_0$. For $ E\in \mathcal E_{L/K}$, let $x_E$ be the $[E:K_1]$-th root of [x] (this makes sense since $[E:K_1]$ is a power of $p$. For $E\subset E'$, one has $x_E = x_E'^{[E':E]}= N_{[E':E]} (x_E')$, and since $\mathcal E_{L/K_1}$ is cofinal in $\mathcal E_{L/K}$, the normic system $(x_E)_{E\in \mathcal E_{L/K_1}}$defines an element of $X_K (L)$, denoted $f_{L/K} (x)$. Using the APF condition, one can show the following theorem :

(i) Let $\alpha, \beta \in X_K (L)$. Then for all $E \in \mathcal E_{L/K}$, the norms $N_{E'/E}(\alpha_E'+\beta_E')$ (for $E\subset E'$) converge (following the filter of sections of $\mathcal E_{L/K}$) to an element $\gamma_E \in E$ and $\alpha + \beta = (\gamma_E)_{E\in \mathcal E_{L/K}}$ is an element of $X_K (L)$.

(ii) $X_K (L)$ is a local field of characteristic $p$, with $v(X_K (L))^* = \mathbf Z$. Moreover, $f_{L/K}$ is an embedding of the residue field $k_L$ into $X_K (L)$ which induces an isomorphism of $k_L$ onto the residue field of $X_K (L)$.

(*) J-M . Fontaine & J-P. Wintenberger, Le corps des normes de certaines extensions algébriques de corps locaux, CR Acad. Sci. Paris, 288 A (1979).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.