1
$\begingroup$

Show that if $\{\mathscr{A}_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ is an increasing sequence of $\text{Algebras}$ of subsets of a set $X$. Show by example that even if $\{\mathscr{A}_n\}$ is a $\sigma-\text{Algebras}$ for every ${n\in\mathbb{N}}$ the union still may not be a $\sigma-\text{Algebra}$. Solution:Let $X=\mathbb{N}$, and $\mathscr{A}_n=$ the family of subsets of $\{1,2,3...n\}$ and their complements. Clearly, $\mathscr{A}_n$ is a $\sigma-\text{Algebras}$ and $\mathscr{A}_1\subset\mathscr{A}_2\subset\mathscr{A}_3...$ However $\bigcup_\limits{n\in\mathbb{N}}^{}\mathscr{A}_n$ is the family of all finite and co-finite subsets of $\mathbb{N}$ which is not a $\sigma-\text{Algebra}$$\:\:\blacksquare$

How can $\bigcup_\limits{n\in\mathbb{N}}^{}\mathscr{A}_n$ not be a $\sigma-\text{Algebra}$ if the sequence is increasing? It seems a contradiction to me. Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What about the example is eluding you? It seems perfectly clear to me. $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Apr 16 '17 at 13:35
  • $\begingroup$ All the $\mathscr{A}_n$ are finite algebras, so trivially $\sigma$-algebras. The first time infinite unions can appear at all is after taking the final union. $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Apr 16 '17 at 13:37
  • $\begingroup$ It is the fact the sequences are increasing which means the union of the sigma-algebras must contain $\mathbb{N} $which countable infinite, that is why I think the union is a sigma-algebra too. What I do not get is the reason behind the family of finite and co-finite subsets of $\mathbb{N} $. $\endgroup$ – Pedro Gomes Apr 16 '17 at 13:38
  • $\begingroup$ Already $\mathscr{A}_0$ contains $\mathbb{N}$ as the complement of $\emptyset$. Nothing to do with increasingness. $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Apr 16 '17 at 13:41
  • $\begingroup$ Why does the union is not a sigma-algebra. It must contain$\mathbb{N}$,right? $\endgroup$ – Pedro Gomes Apr 16 '17 at 13:42
2
$\begingroup$

A set $A$ is in $\mathscr{A}_n$ iff $A \subseteq \{1,\ldots n\}$ or $X\setminus A \subseteq \{1,\ldots,n\}$. This is just the definition of $\mathscr{A}_n$.

$A \in \mathscr{A}:= \bigcup_n \mathscr{A}_n$ iff $\exists n: A \in \mathscr{A}_n$ iff $\exists n: A \subseteq \{1,\ldots, n\} \text{ or } X\setminus A \subseteq \{1,\ldots,n\}$ iff $A$ is finite or $A$ is cofinite (i.e. has finite complement )

Now, $A_k = \{2k\}$ for $k \in \mathbb{N}$ is in $\mathscr{A}_{2k} \subseteq \mathscr{A}$, but the union of the $A_k$ is the set of even numbers $E$ which is not in $\mathscr{A}$ by the above criterion: it's neither finite nor cofinite. So $\mathscr{A}$ is indeed not a $\sigma$-algebra, exactly for the reason claimed.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. $\endgroup$ – Aloizio Macedo Nov 10 '18 at 0:08
3
$\begingroup$

Hint: Find a sequence $(a_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ such that both $$A := \bigcup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \{a_n\} \qquad \text{and} \qquad A^c$$ are infinite sets. Show that $A \notin \bigcup_k \mathcal{A}_k$ and conclude that $\bigcup_k \mathcal{A}_k$ is not closed under countable unions, hence not a $\sigma$-algebra.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How can $A\notin\bigcup_k \mathcal{A}_k$ if $\mathcal{A}_k$, contains $\mathbb{N}$? $\endgroup$ – Pedro Gomes Apr 16 '17 at 15:16
  • $\begingroup$ @PedroGomes why do you think that $\mathbb{N} \in \mathcal{A}_k$ implies $A \in \bigcup_k \mathcal{A}_k$.....? You have to choose the sequence $(a_n)_n$ in such a way that $A^c$ is infinite (in particular $A \neq \mathbb{N}$ because otherwise $A^c = \emptyset$ wouldn't be an infinite set). $\endgroup$ – saz Apr 16 '17 at 15:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.