0
$\begingroup$

It is written in an article that $\rho_{n_k}*\mu_k$, where $\mu_{k}=k^{-1}|\Omega|\sum_{i=1}^{k}\delta_{a_i}$, converges to $1$ in the weak $*$ notion, i.e., $\int_{\Omega}\phi(\rho_{n_k}*\mu_k) dx\rightarrow\int_{\Omega}\phi dx$ for every $\phi\in C_0(\overline{\Omega})$ as $k\rightarrow\infty$, where $[C_0(\overline{\Omega})]^{*}=\mathfrak{M}(\Omega)$, $\mathfrak{M}(\Omega)$ being the space of measures. $\rho_{n_k}$ refers to a mollifier with support $B(0,1/n)$. $(a_i)$ are uniformly distributed points in $\Omega$ a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^N$. How do we show that in the weak * notion this holds?.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Convergence when $n\to\infty$, or $k\to\infty$, or both? Is anything assumed about the $a_i$? (And why do you write $\rightharpoonup^*$ for what appears to be ordinary convergence of real numbers? And you probably ought to add some parentheses: $\int_\Omega \phi(\rho_n*\mu_k)\,dx$ is unambiguous, and probably what you meant.) $\endgroup$ – Harald Hanche-Olsen Apr 15 '17 at 17:46
  • $\begingroup$ @Harald Hanche-Olsen Made a few changes as per your remarks. Does this help?. $\endgroup$ – Alexander Apr 15 '17 at 22:17
1
$\begingroup$

First, note that $$ (\rho_n*\mu_k)(x)=k^{-1}\lvert\Omega\rvert\sum_{i=1}^k \rho_n(x-a_i), $$ and therefore $$ \begin{split} \int_\Omega \varphi(x)(\rho_n*\mu_k)(x)\,dx &= k^{-1}\lvert\Omega\rvert\sum_{i=1}^k \int_\Omega \varphi(x) \rho_n(x-a_i)\,dx \\&= k^{-1}\lvert\Omega\rvert\sum_{i=1}^k(\tilde\rho_n*\varphi)(a_i) \\&= \color{blue}{k^{-1}\lvert\Omega\rvert\sum_{i=1}^k\varphi(a_i)}+ \color{red}{k^{-1}\lvert\Omega\rvert\sum_{i=1}^k\bigl((\tilde\rho_n*\varphi)(a_i)-\varphi(a_i)\bigr)} \end{split} $$ where $\tilde\rho_n(x)=\rho_n(-x)$.

Here, I identify $C_0(\overline\Omega)$ with the set of continuous functions on $\mathbb{R}^N$ vanishing outside $\Omega$. It follows from the equidistribution of the sequence $(a_i)$ that $$ \color{blue}{\lim_{k\to\infty}k^{-1}\lvert\Omega\rvert\sum_{i=1}^k\varphi(a_i)=\int_\Omega \varphi\,dx}. $$

To finish the proof, you only need to notice that $\tilde\rho_n*\varphi\to\varphi$ uniformly as $n\to\infty$, by the uniform continuity of $\varphi$, so the red term above vanishes in the limit as $n\to\infty$ (uniformly in $k$).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.