2
$\begingroup$

Using Todd-Coxeter algorithm (a handy long calculations), I could find that the subgroup $H=\langle ab,abc\rangle$ of group $$G=\langle a,b,c|abcab^{-1}=bcabc^{-1}=cabca^{-1}=1\rangle$$ is of index $1$ in $G$ and has a new presentation as $$H=\langle x,y|y^{-1}xy^2x^2=1,xy=yx^{-3}yx\rangle$$ May I ask here to have another simpler way, at least in this group. Thank you.

$\endgroup$
0
3
$\begingroup$

Clearly $H=\langle ab, abc\rangle=\langle ab, c\rangle$ as $(ab^{-1})abc=c$. On the other hand, $b^{-1}=c(ab)c^{-1}$ by the first relation. Thus, $b, c\in H$. As $ab, b\in H$, $b\in H$ and so $G=\langle ab, abc\rangle=H$. We therefore have index one.

To get the presentation for $G$ in terms of $ab, abc$, we re-write the presentation we have for $G$ in terms of $ab$ and $abc$. Start by just doing this for $a$, $b$ and $c$,

$c=(ab)^{-1}(abc)=x^{-1}y$ $a=(ab)^{-1}(abc)(ab)(ab)^{-1}(abc)=x^{-1}y^2$ $b=(ab)^{-1}(abc)(ab)^{-1}(abc)^{-1}(ab)=x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^{-1}x$

Then rewriting $G$ in terms of $x$ and $y$ we get,

$H=\langle a, b, c, x, y; a=x^{-1}y^2, b=x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^{-1}x, c=x^{-1}y^2, abcab^{-1}=1, bcabc^{-1}=1, cabca^{-1}=1\rangle$

$\Rightarrow H=\langle x, y; x^{-1}y^2x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^{-1}xx^{-1}y^2x^{-1}y^2(x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^{-1}x)^{-1}=1, x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^{-1}xx^{-1}y^2x^{-1}y^2x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^{-1}x(x^{-1}y^2)^{-1}=1, x^{-1}y^2x^{-1}y^2x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^{-1}xx^{-1}y^2(x^{-1}y^2)^{-1}=1\rangle$

$\Rightarrow H=\langle x, y; x^{-1}y^2x^{-1}yx^{-1}yx^{-1}y^2x^{-1}yxy^{-1}x=1, x^{-1}yx^{-1}yx^{-1}y^2x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^{-1}xy^{-2}x=1, x^{-1}y^2x^{-1}y^2x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^{-1}x=1\rangle$

$\Rightarrow H=\langle x, y; yx^{-1}yx^{-1}yx^{-1}y^2x^{-1}yx=1, x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^2x^{-1}yx^{-1}y^{-1}xy^{-1}=1, yx^{-1}y^2x^{-1}yx^{-1}=1\rangle$

Tidy it up a bit and you should get the same as what you have (assuming that neither of us have made any mistakes in our working, which, for my part, isn't unlikely...).

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ These calculations look tedious and thank you for it, your time specially 1729. ;) $\endgroup$
    – Mikasa
    Oct 29 '12 at 15:50
  • $\begingroup$ They are as non-tedious as you are going to get! Of course, you could just use GAP... $\endgroup$
    – user1729
    Oct 29 '12 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ Also, I skipped lots of steps when I was doing it. For example, I didn't write the presentation $\langle a, b, c, x, y;\ldots\rangle$, I got got rid of the $a$, $b$ and $c$ without thinking about it. $\endgroup$
    – user1729
    Oct 29 '12 at 16:05
  • $\begingroup$ I see that. Thanks again for your time. I am working on your calculations to know more and find my own for another time. :) $\endgroup$
    – Mikasa
    Oct 29 '12 at 16:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @coffeemath: Maple can do groups?! I'm pretty sure all groups of order $p^2q$ are classified, but I cannot be sure (all groups of order $pq$ are, and this is a classic undergrad question). Also, all groups of order $p^aq^b$ are soluble (and so not simple if $ab\neq 0$). $\endgroup$
    – user1729
    Oct 29 '12 at 19:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.