7
$\begingroup$

An important fact in the theory of central simple algebras is the double centralizer theorem, which says: if $k$ is a field, $A$ is a $k$-algebra, $V$ is a faithful semisimple $A$-algebra, then $C(C(A)) = A$, where $C(A)$ is the centralizer of $A$ in $End_k(V)$.

Taking the centralizer is an inclusion-reversing operation. If we consider the algebra $M_n(k)$ of $n\times n$ matrices over a field $k$, identfying $k$ with the scalar matrices and $\Delta$ with the diagonal matrices, we get $C(k)$ = $M_n(k)$, $C(M_n(k)) = k$, and $C(\Delta) = \Delta$.

(1) This suggests that the centralizer operation is something like a duality between $k$-subalgebras. Is there any truth to this?

(2) Will there always be a subalgebra like $\Delta$ which is its own centralizer?

I'm not exactly sure what conditions to put on $k, A$, and $V$, so I'm open to flexibility on that.

(3) Does a double centralizer result hold in the context of groups? (i.e. $C_G(C_G(H)) = H$?). If not in general, for what groups does this hold?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

1) The connection you're looking for is that $C(-)$ is an anti-tone Galois connection (with itself.) This is indeed a "type of duality."

2) I'm not sure in general. The approach using anti-tone Galois connections certainly doesn't always work that way. For example, if you take the operation to be set complementation within a nonempty set $Y$, then $Y\setminus X = C(X)\neq X$ for any $X$.

On the other hand, if $A$ is the annihilator operator on the lattice of ideals of a commutative ring, then the lattice of all $A(I)$ might or might not have a fixed point. Example: $\mathbb R[x]/(x^2)$ it has the fixed point $A((x))=(x)$, but in $\mathbb R[x]/(x^3)$ it does not. This leads me to believe that the answer to your question depends somewhat on the algebra. You've picked a particularly nice type of algebra (a matrix algebra over a field.) If you chose, instead, $M_n(\mathbb H)$, then $\Delta \nsubseteq C(\Delta)$. But of course there might still be another subring that does the trick.

3) Because of the properties of $CC(-)$ considered as a closure operator (as described in the link above.) In fact for any nonempty set $X$, $C(X)=C(C(C(X))$. Proof: We know that $C^2(X)\supseteq X$ for any $X$. Applying $C$ on both sides you get $C(C^2(X))\subseteq C(X)$. On the other hand $C(X)\subseteq C^2(C(X))$. $C^3=C$ holds with any Galois closure operator, but in general you may have $C^2(X)\supsetneq X$ for some subsets. Anyhow, we've learned that $C$ acts like an involution on the set of all $C(X)$, whenever $C$ is a closure operator like this.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, so the centralizer operator is an anti-tone Galois connection both in the case of algebras over a field and in the case of groups? But I don't see how that statement for (2) answers the question of a fixed point of the operator. $\endgroup$ Apr 11, 2017 at 18:55
  • $\begingroup$ @festering Sorry, I think you're right: I was thinking of $C(X)$ being a fixed point of $C^2(X)$ for every $X$. In that case, $C$ is acting like an involution on the sets of the form $C(X)$. I will see if I can adjust that. $\endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Apr 11, 2017 at 19:59
  • $\begingroup$ @festering In other words, my head was more in the realm of 3). I adjusted things, and you can let me know what else might be interesting to change. $\endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Apr 11, 2017 at 20:13
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, this mostly answers my questions. If you know where I can get any more information on fixed points of such a Galois connection, that would be of interest. $\endgroup$ Apr 12, 2017 at 11:49
  • $\begingroup$ @festering I will keep an eye out. I'd also like to know $\endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Apr 12, 2017 at 12:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.