0
$\begingroup$

I have seen 4 major ways to solve the second order wave equation given by:

$$\frac{\partial^2 u} {\partial t^2} = c^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} $$

The methods are as follows:

1) D'Alembert's solution

2) Separation of variables

3) Fourier/Fast Fourier Transform

4) Laplace Transform

I have mainly looked into methods 1, 3 and 4. I have also seen instances where method 2 was used. Only the last two seem appropriate to solve the wave equation with boundary conditions of the form:

$$u_x(0,t) = \sin t$$ $$u(L,t) = 0$$

Where $L$ is a constant.

Am I correct in assuming that methods 1 and 2 cannot handle these boundary conditions while methods 3 and 4 can? If so why does d'Alembert's solution and separation of variables have this limitation? Is there another (more straightforward) method than the last two to solve this problem?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Separation of variables is used a lot to handle the wave equation with finite boundary conditions. The technique is as follows:

let $u_{tt}-cu_{xx}=0$ (consider the homogeneous case) with $u(0,t)=1=u(L,t)$ for the domain $D=\{[0,L]\times \mathbb{R}^+\}$ (as an example, consider a vibrating string with length $L$ and measure motion starting at time $0$) The idea of separation of variables is to write the solution $u(x,t)$, which is a function of two variables, as a product of two, single-variable functions. $u(x,t)=X(x)T(t)$ is common. This will work for linear PDEs, but not non-linear ones (also I don't think quasi-linear either).

we can write $T''(t)X(x)=c^2X''(x)T(t)$. We can algebraically rewrite this as: $\frac{T''}{T}=\frac{c^2X''}{X}$. Note that the only way for these two functions to be equal is if they are both constant, so we typically denote this by $\lambda$, and write $\frac{T''}{T}=\frac{c^2X''}{X}=\lambda$

Next, we partition into two ODEs, and obtain: $T''=\lambda T$ and $X''=\lambda c^2X$.

We want to consider all possible values of $\lambda$. The classic technique/trick is to partition into three cases, and solve for position (x coordinate) first: $\lambda=0$

In this case, we get $X''=0$, and the solution to this ODE is $X(x)=Ax+B$ where $A$ and $B$ are arbitrary constants. Now, plug in boundary conditions: $X(0)=B$ and $X(L)=AL+B$, we want solutions which satisfy the boundary conditions, so we set them equal, but $X(0)=X(L)=AL+B=B$ has no solution unless $A$ is $0$ ($L$ is assumed to be of positive, finite length), and this forces $B$ to be zero as well, so no solution exists for $\lambda=0$

second: $\lambda>0$ Here we get the familiar ODE $X''-c^2\lambda X=0$ The solutions: $X(x)=Ae^{-\lambda x}+Be^{\lambda x}$. A similar calculation with the boundary conditions shows us that we only get the trivial solution of $X(x)=0$

third: $\lambda <0$, we get the ODE $X''+c^2\lambda X=0$

We obtain $X(x)=Asin(\sqrt{\lambda x})+Bcos(\sqrt{\lambda x})$

Plugging in our boundary conditions again, we get $X(0)=B$ and $X(L)=Asin(\sqrt{\lambda L})+Bsin(\sqrt{\lambda L})$ We don't want the $sin$, so we want to find $Bcos(\sqrt{\lambda L})=B$, which reduces to $cos(\sqrt{\lambda L})=1$. The eigenvalues are $\lambda_{n}=\frac{4n^2\pi^2}{L}$ (set $\sqrt{\lambda L}=2n\pi$ which gives you all the values where the cosine is 1.) so our eigenfunctions are $X_n(x)=Acos(\frac{4n^2\pi^2}{L}x)$

We don't need to do the three cases for $T(t)$ because we already know $\lambda<0$. Our eigenfunctions are computed similarly, but since we aren't considering a "time boundary", we get $T_n(t)=Acos(\frac{4n^2\pi^2t}{L})+Bsin(\frac{4n^2\pi^2}{L}t)$

combining gives the solution $u(x,t)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}X_n(x)T_n(t)$ You can plug in various other boundary conditions into the series expansion. Seperation of variables will work just fine.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.