I've tried a few "criteria" to check if this is irreducible. According to Maple it only has one entirely real root which I suspect is not rational but I can't prove it so I'm attempting to check if $p$ is irreducible.

Eisenstein's Criterion doesn't work here and I'm yet to find a suitable transformation such that it could work. I also read that if a polynomial is irreducible over $\Bbb F_q$, with $q$ a prime not dividing the leading coefficient, then it is irreducible over $\Bbb Q$ so I reduced the polynomial modulo $2$ to obtain

$$p \equiv x^5 + x^3 + 1 \mod 2.$$

I think this is correct but then I need to know how to check the irreducibility of this new polynomial over $\Bbb F_2$. Do I simply need to check that neither $0$ nor $1$ are roots of this polynomial? (And am I applying this theorem correctly?)

If this polynomial IS irreducible over $\Bbb Q$, is the splitting field obtained by simply adjoining the roots to $\Bbb Q$?

  • $\begingroup$ Since the polynomial is of degree $5$ it might be possible for it to have no roots in $\mathbb{Q}$, but be reducible. Writing it as a product of polynomials of degree $2$ and $3$ might be possible. $\endgroup$
    – Stefan4024
    Apr 9 '17 at 11:11
  • $\begingroup$ To answer your last question: yes. This follows straight from the definition of a splitting field. $\endgroup$
    – user583416
    Apr 9 '17 at 11:18
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, I've found something wonderful. Answer coming up. $\endgroup$ Apr 9 '17 at 11:19

.A little bit of scouting for nice irreducibility criteria throws up some very nice results:

Here is a lovely lemma by (Prof.) Ram Murty:

Let $f(x) = a_mx^m + ... + a_1x + a_0$ be a polynomial of degree $m$ in $\mathbb Z[x]$. Let $H = \displaystyle\max_{0 \leq i \leq m-1} \left|\frac{a_i}{a_m}\right|$. If $f(n)$ is prime for some $n \geq H+2$, then $f(x)$ is irreducible in $\mathbb Z[x]$.

I'll give the link : http://cms.dm.uba.ar/academico/materias/2docuat2011/teoria_de_numeros/Irreducible.pdf

In our case, $a_m = 1$, and the maximum of all the quantities in question is $2$. Hence, if $f(n)$ is prime for some $n \geq 4$, then we are done.

You can check that for $n=4$, the number $f(4) =919$, which is prime!

Hence, it follows that the polynomial is irreducible.

ASIDE : There is also a "shifted" base (base shifts from $0...n-1$ to $|b| < \frac n2$) version of Cohn's criteria, which will tell you that if $f(10)$ is prime, then the given polynomial is irreducible. This matches that description, since all coefficients are between $-5$ and $5$. Very interestingly, $f(10) = 98779$ is also prime! (Hence, another proof by another wonderful result).

  • $\begingroup$ That is very cool! Thanks for the link. $\endgroup$ Apr 9 '17 at 11:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You are welcome. I've seen some of these criteria very long ago, while doing a Galois theory polynomial "scouting mission". $\endgroup$ Apr 9 '17 at 11:31
  • $\begingroup$ Nice method. Just wondering, why not going already with $f(4)=919$ which is also a prime? $\endgroup$
    – Sil
    Apr 26 '18 at 23:30
  • $\begingroup$ You are right, it works out. I was doing that calculation mentally, so I skipped directly to $n=5$ because I must have made some mistake at $f(4)$. $\endgroup$ Apr 26 '18 at 23:34

By Gauss' Lemma we have that the polynomial is irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}$ if and only if it's irreducible over $\mathbb{Z}$. Now the easiest way would be to prove that polynomial is irreducible over $\mathbb{Z}_2$, which would be enough.

Assume it's reducible. As the polynomial has no roots over $\mathbb{Z}_2$, then the only possibility is if it's a product of polynomials of degree $2$ and $3$. So assume that:

$$x^5 + x^3 + 1 = (x^3 + ax^2 + bx + c)(x^2 + dx + e) \quad \quad \text{over } \quad\mathbb{Z}_2$$

Then multiply everything out and compare the factors. As $a,b,c,d,e \in \mathbb{Z}_2$, you only have two options. Eventually you will get that $c=e=1$ and $a=d=b$. But this would imply that $c+bd + ea = a^2 + a + 1 = 1$ in $\mathbb{Z}_2$. But this is impossible, as it's the coefficient in front of $x^2$ and it should be $0$.

Hence the polynomial is irreducible over $\mathbb{Z}_2$ and eventually $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think I'll accept this one as being the most useful in a general setting, thanks a lot. $\endgroup$ Apr 9 '17 at 11:28
  • $\begingroup$ One could also just divide by the only irreducible polynomial in $\mathbb{Z_2}[x]$ which is $x^2+x+1$ and see it cannot be the factor. $\endgroup$
    – Sil
    Aug 11 '18 at 9:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Sil True. However I doubt that an OP asking factorizing of a polynomial is aware that $x^2+x+1$ is the only irreducible quadratic in $\mathbb{Z}_2$ $\endgroup$
    – Stefan4024
    Aug 11 '18 at 9:25

Your proof is almost complete: it is indeed sufficient to prove that $p(x)\in \mathbb F_2[x]$ (the reduction mod $2$ of your polynomial) is irreducible.
The polynomial $p(x)$ has no factor of degree $1$ since it has no zero in $\mathbb F_2$, so there remains only to prove that $p(x)$ has no factor which is an irreducible polynomial $g(x)\in \mathbb F_2[x]$ of degree $2$.
But the only such irreducible polynomial is $g(x)=x^2+x+1$ and long division proves that it does not divide $p(x)$. All is proved.


By the rational root theorem, any rational root of $p$ would have to be a divisor of the constant term, so $\pm1$. Clearly, these are not roots.

Similary, any quadratic factor would have to be $x^2+ax\pm1$ with $a\in\Bbb Z$. You might be able to exclude these manually ...


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.