Let $l_{\mathbb{R}}^{\infty}$ be the linear space of all real-valued bounded sequences over $\mathbb{R}$ for $x=(x_n)_n$ define $$ p(x) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sup \frac{x_1 + \dots x_n}{n} \\ W = \{x \in l_{\mathbb{R}}^{\infty} : \lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{x_1 + \dots + x_n}{n} \text{ exists } \} $$

Prove that there is a linear functional LIM on $l_{\mathbb{R}}^{\infty}$ with the following properties

a) $LIM(x_1,x_2,\dots) = LIM(x_2,x_3,\dots)$

b) $\lim \inf_{n \to \infty} x_n \leq LIM(x_1,x_2, \dots) \leq \lim \sup_{n \to \infty} x_n$

c) LIM is continuous with $\|LIM\|=1$.

Since $W$ is a linear subspace I defined a functional $\psi_0(x) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{x_1 + \dots + x_n}{n}$ where $\psi_0(x) = p(x)$ on $W$.

Then by Hahn-Banach there exits $\psi$ s.t $\psi(x) = \psi_0 (x)$ on $W$ and $\psi(x) \leq p(x)$ on $V$. But how can I continue?


First, the following easy corollary of Hahn-Banach for normed spaces might be useful:

Proposition: Let $X$ be a normed space, and let $Y$ be a subspace with $\phi\in Y^*$. Then $\phi$ has an extension to $\tilde{\phi}\in X^*$ such that $\|\phi\|=\|\tilde{\phi}\|$.

To prove this, apply the usual Hahn Banach theorem with $p(x)=\|\phi\|\|x\|$

Now, as you did before, define

$\psi_0:W\to\mathbb{R}$ by


By Hahn-Banach, we can extend this to a function $Lim:l^{\infty}\to\mathbb{R}$ such that


Let's prove part c) first now. In light of the above, we need only show that

$\|\psi_0\|=1$. Indeed, we have $\frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^{n}x_n\leq \frac{n\|(x_n)_n\|_{\infty}}{n}=\|(x_n)_n\|_{\infty}$

Thus $\|\psi_0\|\leq 1$. To see that $\|\psi_o\|=1$, consider the sequence $x\in W$ with only ones as its entries.

This proves c).

For part a)

Note that by linearity:



This proves a)

Finally, for part b), let $x=(x_n)\in l^{\infty}$ Choose $a,b$ so that

$a<\liminf_{n\to\infty}(x_n)$ and


Then there is $N$ such that for $n>N$, we have $a<x_n<b$.

Denote now 1 by the sequence with only ones as its entries and denote $y=(y_n)_n$ as the sequence such that $y_n=x_{n+N}$

Then $w:=y-a\cdot$1 and $z:=b\cdot$1$-y$ are positive and bounded sequences.


$0\leq Lim(w)=Lim(y)-a=Lim(x)-a$

So that, $a\leq Lim(x)$

where the last equality was obtained using the shift invariance proven in a)

Similarly, we obtain $Lim(x)\leq b$.

Since, $a$ and $b$ were arbitrary, b) follows.

The one step that needs justification is that if $x=(x_n)_n$ is positive and bounded, then $Lim(x)\geq 0$

Indeed, without loss of generality, $\|x\|\leq1$(otherwise, rescale x)

Now, $1-Lim(x)=Lim($1$-x)\leq\|$1$-x\|\leq 1$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.