7
$\begingroup$

Does there exist a subspace of $\Bbb R^2$ with fundamental group $\Bbb Z \oplus \Bbb Z$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think so. I think that connected subspace of $\mathbb R^2$ should retract on something like $U \backslash D$ where $D$ is a disjoint union of disks and $U$ is open and connected. Thus the fundamental group of subspace should be something like free group on $|D|$ generators. But I have no rigorous proof of what I am saying. $\endgroup$ – user171326 Apr 8 '17 at 15:00
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah intuitively that's what seems.... $\endgroup$ – CoffeeCCD Apr 8 '17 at 15:01
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ In general a connected subspace of $\mathbb{R}^2$ doesn't need to behave like that. The Hawaiian earring has a very big (and I think nonfree) fundamental group for example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaiian_earring $\endgroup$ – Jef L Apr 8 '17 at 15:12
10
$\begingroup$

No. I prove in this answer that $H_2(X;\Bbb Z)$ surjects onto $H_2(K(\pi_1 X, 1);\Bbb Z)$. (Actually, the coefficients can be whatever you want.) If you want to do this for gross $X$ this is still true but you need to use CW approximation. Further, for $X$ compact, it follows immediately from (Cech) Alexander duality that $H_2(X) =0$. If you further assume that $X$ is locally contractible, you can drop the Cech parenthetical; in this case, the techniques used in the proof can all be found in a first-year course on algebraic topology (even though they require heavier machinery than the fundamental group alone).

Unfortunately without these assumptions this gets more difficult. It is apparently a theorem of Zaslow that the higher homology of any subset of the plane vanishes identically. For $\pi_1 X = \Bbb Z^2$, $K(\Bbb Z^2,1) = T^2$, so we see that the second homology of any space with $\Bbb Z^2$ fundamental group is nontrivial.

In fact, being a subset of the plane places severe restrictions on the fundamental group; see here. In particular, any finitely generated subgroup is free. I consider this much harder than the first paragraph, but that's probably partly because I only know how to prove what's in the first paragraph.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I would be interested in a proof specific to the case of $\Bbb Z^2$, perhaps that doesn't require much machinery. I'm skeptical it exists, though. $\endgroup$ – user98602 Apr 8 '17 at 22:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.