I am confused with how to show that an orthogonal matrix with determinant 1 must always be a rotation matrix.

My approach to proving this was to take a general matrix $\begin{bmatrix}a&b \\c&d\end{bmatrix}$ and using the definition of a matrix being orthogonal, work out some restrictions on $a,b,c,d$ such that the matrix must be a rotation matrix.

Doing this; I end up with $\begin{bmatrix}a&b \\c&d\end{bmatrix}^T\begin{bmatrix}a&b \\c&d\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}a^2+c^2&ab+cd \\ab+cd&b^2+d^2\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}1&0 \\0&1\end{bmatrix}$

We also know $ad-bc=1$ from the determinant restriction.

I thought we could say since $a^2+c^2=1$ then we could say $a=\cos(\theta)$ and $c=\sin(\theta)$. From here we could chose the second column of the matrix to a vector such that $b=-\cos(\pi/2-\theta)$ and $d=\sin(\pi/2-\theta)$ which gives $b=-\sin(\theta)$ and d=$\cos(\theta)$.

This would give $\begin{bmatrix}\cos(\theta)&-\sin(\theta) \\\sin(\theta)&\cos(\theta)\end{bmatrix}$ which is the rotation matrix I need to show.

Is this correct and is there a better approach to help me prove that any orthogonal matrix with determinant 1 must be a rotation matrix?


We can say $a=\cos(\theta)$ and $c=\sin(\theta)$ as we know $a^2+c^2=1$ and so $a$ and $c$ must lie on the unit circle, hence we can parameterise the variables in the matrix as such.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Notice that the last matrix equality generates 3 distinct equations: $a^2 + c^2 = 1$, $ab+cd =0$, $b^2+d^2=1$. Furthermore, the determinant gives another: $ad-bc =1$. So you have $4$ equations in $4$ unknowns. See what you can do to eliminate parameters and reduce to everything as a function of $1$ variable. Note that these equations are non-linear.... $\endgroup$ – erfink Apr 1 '17 at 21:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could we say that the points $a$ and $c$ lie on a unit circle and therefore can be represented via their parametric form? $\endgroup$ – user258521 Apr 1 '17 at 21:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ But knowing $a^2 + c^2 = 1 \implies |a| \leq 1$ so that $a$ really is the cosine of some angle. It could be more spelled out, but there's nothing wrong there (IMO). $\endgroup$ – pjs36 Apr 1 '17 at 21:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mathreadler agreed---fallacy is probably a bit too strong of a word. My point is that this is really the crux of the entire problem and needs a sentence of exposition about why it is true. $\endgroup$ – erfink Apr 1 '17 at 21:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You should specify if your question is for $2\times 2$ case only. $\endgroup$ – A.Γ. Apr 1 '17 at 22:05

The sentence "From here we could chose the second column of the matrix..." is ambiguous. You cannot choose $b$ and $d$, they are given. You need to prove that they are $\sin$ and $\cos$.

For example, since $$ a^2+c^2=1,\\ d^2+b^2=1, $$ the points $(a,c)$ and $(d,b)$ are on the unit circle and can be parameterized as $$ (a,c)=(\cos\theta,\sin\theta),\\ (d,b)=(\cos\phi,\sin\phi). $$ Now another two equations that you know are $$ ab+cd=0 \quad\Leftrightarrow\quad\cos\theta\sin\phi+\sin\theta\cos\phi=\sin(\theta+\phi)=0,\\ ad-bc=1\quad\Leftrightarrow\quad\cos\theta\cos\phi-\sin\theta\sin\phi=\cos(\theta+\phi)=1. $$ It gives $\theta+\phi=2\pi k$, which makes $$ b=\sin(2\pi k-\theta)=-\sin\theta,\\ d=\cos(2\pi k-\theta)=\cos\theta. $$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.