1
$\begingroup$

I'm doing exercise 5.9 of Greenberg and Harper which is the following: Let $E \overset{p}{\longrightarrow}X$ covering space, connected and locally path-connected. Obtain homomorphism from $N$ normalizer of $p_\ast \left(\pi_1(E,e_0) \right)$ onto $G$ the group of covering transformations with kernel $p_\ast\left( \pi_1(E,e_0) \right)$.

So far I have done the following:

Let $e_0, e_1 \in p^{-1}(x_0)$. Since $E$ is connected and locally path-connected it is also connected. Then let $\tilde{\alpha} : I \longrightarrow E$ be the path that connects $e_0$ and $e_1$. Thus, $p \circ \tilde{\alpha} = \alpha$ with $\alpha$ a loop in $X$ which we represent as the element $n\in \pi_1(X,x_0)$. $E$ is path connected, so $\pi_1(X,x_0)$ acts transitively on $E$ and we have $p_\ast\left( \pi_1(E,e_0)\right) = n \cdot p_\ast\left( \pi_1(E,e_1)\right) \cdot n^{-1}$. Additionally, if $n \in N \Longleftrightarrow p_\ast\left( \pi_1(E,e_0)\right) = p_\ast\left( \pi_1(E,e_1)\right)$.

At this point, my idea was to prove that if we have $ p_\ast\left(\pi_1(E,e_0)\right) = p_\ast\left( \pi_1(E,e_1)\right)$, then there exists a homeomorphism $\phi \in G$ s.t. $\phi(e_0)=e_1$, however I don't know how to proceed so some hints or advice would be greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Some remarks:

  • You are right that $p_\star(\pi_1(E, e_0)) = \alpha . p_\star(\pi_1(E, e_1)) . \alpha^{-1}$, where $\alpha = p \circ \widetilde \alpha$ and $\widetilde \alpha$ is any path in $E$ from $e_0$ to $e_1$.

  • You are right that, if $p_\star(\pi_1(E, e_0)) = p_\star(\pi_1(E,e_1))$, then there exists a unique covering transformation sending $e_0$ to $e_1$. To prove this, you could use the general lifting criterion (Hatcher pages 61 and 62):

If $p: (E, e) \to (X,x)$ is a covering map and $f : (Y, y) \to (X, x)$ is another map, with $Y$ path connected and locally path connected, then there exists a lift $\widetilde f : (Y,y) \to (E, e)$ such that $p \circ \widetilde f = f$ iff $f_\star(\pi_1(Y,y)) \subset p_\star (\pi_1(E, e))$. If these conditions are satisfied, then this lift is unique.
  • I presume you want to define your map $N \to G$ in the following way. Taking a homotopy class $n \in N \subset \pi_1(X,x_0)$, pick any loop $\alpha$ in this class, and lift $\alpha$ to a path $\widetilde \alpha$ on $E$ such that $\alpha(0) = e_0$ and $p \circ \widetilde \alpha = \alpha$. Define $e_1$ to be the endpoint $\alpha(1)$, and define the covering transformation $\tau \in G$ associated to $n$ to be the unique covering transformation sending $e_0 $ to $e_1$. This works, provided that you check that the covering transformation you get is independent of your choice of representative $\alpha$ for the homotopy class $n$!

  • You need to check this your map from $N$ to $G$ is actually a group homomorphism. Try to use the "uniqueness of lifts" theorem to show that, if the homotopy classes $n_1$ and $n_2 \in N$ are represented by loops $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$ lifting to the paths $\widetilde \alpha_1$ and $\widetilde \alpha_2$ starting at $e_0$ in $E$, and if $n_1$ and $n_2$ give rise to the covering transformations $\tau_1$ and $\tau_2 \in G$, then the loop $n_1 . n_2$ must lift to the path $\widetilde \alpha_1 . \tau_1(\widetilde \alpha_2)$. Try to deduce that the endpoint of the lift of $n_1 . n_2$ is $\tau_1(\tau_2(e_0))$, so the covering transformation associated to $n_1 . n_2$ maps $e_0$ to $\tau_1(\tau_2(e_0))$, and hence, is equal to $\tau_1 \circ \tau_2$.

  • Just for fun, you might like to show that the kernel of your homomorphism $N \to G$ is $p_\star(\pi_1(E, e_0))$. (Of course, your homomorphism $N \to G$ is surjective.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The lifting criterion in Greenberg and Harper is only introduced in the following chapter, so I guess I shouldn't rely on it for the proof. Do you recall another method of proving the existence of the unique covering transformation? $\endgroup$ – peter19 Mar 28 '17 at 15:23
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm. Off the top of my head, I can't think of another way! Perhaps somebody else can. But you could always prove the general lifting criterion! It's quite a fun proof! :-) $\endgroup$ – Kenny Wong Mar 28 '17 at 16:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.