2
$\begingroup$

I am pretty sure there is an easy Counter example But i do not find One right Now.

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by Umberto P., Claude Leibovici, user91500, happymath, Shailesh Mar 28 '17 at 10:38

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Umberto P., Claude Leibovici, user91500, happymath, Shailesh
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ $\mathbb{Z}$ has the discrete topology, hence if $L$ is the limit, $\{L\}$ is a neighbourhood of $L$. Applying the definition of limit yields the fact that the sequence is eventually constant immediately. $\endgroup$ – Aloizio Macedo Mar 27 '17 at 19:37
1
$\begingroup$

Your question is in-correct, there is no counter-example.

For a sequence of integers $(n_k)$ to converge, you need: for any $\varepsilon >0 $, there is an integer $K >0$, such that $k \ge K \ \ \implies \ \ \left|n_k-n_K\right| < \varepsilon $.

If, for example, $\varepsilon = \frac{1}{4}$, then $\left|n_k-n_K\right| < \varepsilon \iff n_k = n_K$. We would need $n_k=n_K$ for all $k>K$. That means the sequence needs to be constant after a certain point.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

HINT: If the sequence $\{a_n\}$ is not eventually constant, then you can find arbitrarily large $n,m$ such that $$\vert a_n - a_m \vert \geq 1.$$

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.