1
$\begingroup$

The original matrix is:

\begin{bmatrix} 1 &2 &0 &1 \\ 3 &3 &3 &9 \\ 1 & 4 & 1 &4 \\ 1 & 1 & 2 &0 \end{bmatrix}

Every time I reduced this to row echelon form, I got $\dfrac{1}{48}$ as the determinant when the actual determinant is $48$. Here are the row operations.

enter image description here

The rows that I have highlighted are the ones that change the determinant since we are changing a row by a factor. All the other operations don't change the determinant and we never switch rows here.

So we get $\det(A) = \dfrac{-1}{3}\times\dfrac{1}{3}\times\dfrac{-3}{16}\times 1 \text{ (entries along diagonal)} = \dfrac{1}{48}$. But the actual determinant is $48$. Where have I went wrong? I did the row operations a couple of times but I am making the same mistake.

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It is the opposite : entries along diagonal times scalar that you multiplied during the process = determinant. $\endgroup$ – arberavdullahu Mar 26 '17 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ Multiplying a single row by a factor of $x$ changes the determinant by multiplication by $x$. So to get the original determinant, you'll have to divide by the factor, not multiply it. Hence you'll get 48. $\endgroup$ – Sebastian Schulz Mar 26 '17 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ Note also that the determinant of a matrix where all entries are integers must be an integer, because it is obtained by taking only products and sums. $\endgroup$ – mlc Mar 26 '17 at 20:21
  • $\begingroup$ @SebastianSchulz why divide? If I have done those scalar multiplication to the row, shouldn't the determinant be the original determinant times these scalars? $\endgroup$ – K Split X Mar 26 '17 at 20:23
  • $\begingroup$ Rather than $\det(A) = \frac{-1}{3}\times\frac{1}{3}\times\frac{-3}{16}\times 1$, it should be $\det(A) \times\frac{-1}{3}\times\frac{1}{3}\times\frac{-3}{16}= 1$. To see why it goes that way and not the other, try with a simpler matrix, like $\left[\begin{smallmatrix}2&0\\0&1\end{smallmatrix}\right]$. $\endgroup$ – Arthur Mar 26 '17 at 20:31
2
$\begingroup$

Let's say we start with a matrix $A$ and perform a row operation of multiplying some row $R_i$ by a non-zero scalar $c$ and get a new matrix $A'$. What is the relation between $\det(A)$ and $\det(A')$? Since the determinant is a multilinear functions of the rows of $A$, we have

$$ \det(A') = c \det(A) \iff \det(A) = \frac{1}{c} \det(A'). $$

If we perform various row operations on $A$, the only operations which change the determinant are the multiplication operations. If we have performed multiplication operations by $c_1,\dots,c_k$ (and maybe other row operations) and arrived to the matrix $A'$, we have

$$ \det(A) = \frac{1}{c_1 \dots c_k} \det(A'). $$

In particular, if you reduced $A$ to an upper diagonal matrix $A'$ whose diagonal entries are $1$ then $\det(A') = 1$ and so

$$ \det(A) = \frac{1}{c_1 \dots c_k}. $$

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for the explanation $\endgroup$ – K Split X Mar 26 '17 at 20:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.