We know that a unit circle has dense rational points. But do spirals also have dense rational points, i.e. for two rational points:

$$(x_1,y_1) = (\sin(t_1) k t_1,\cos(t_1) k t_1) \in \mathbb Q^2$$

$$(x_2,y_2) = (\sin(t_2) k t_2,\cos(t_2) k t_2) \in \mathbb Q^2$$

with $t_1 < t_2$, is there a third rational point $(x_3,y_3)$ from a $t_3$, with $t_1 < t_3$ and $t_3 < t_2$? Is there a proof or disproof of rational density?

Please note: We do not make any rationality assumptions about the parameter $k$ except $k > 0$.

  • $\begingroup$ .. .. ... what is $k$ ? $\endgroup$ – mercio Mar 25 '17 at 23:35
  • $\begingroup$ that's not really what dense means... at all. Do you count $(0,0)$ as a rational point belonging on all the spirals ? $\endgroup$ – mercio Mar 26 '17 at 0:11
  • $\begingroup$ well then most spirals (all but countably many) have $(0,0)$ as their only rational point, which means that according to your strange definition, they have dense rational points. $\endgroup$ – mercio Mar 26 '17 at 0:16

The statement is false.

$\newcommand\Q{\mathbf{Q}}$ $\newcommand\Qb{\overline{\mathbf{Q}}}$ $\newcommand\Z{\mathbf{Z}}$ $\newcommand\p{\mathfrak{p}}$

Let's first consider the much wider class of non-zero points $P = (x,y)$ where $x$ and $y$ are merely assumed to be algebraic numbers (i.e. solutions to polynomials with rational coefficients).

Suppose that $P = (x,y) \in \Qb \times \Qb$ is such a point. Then

$$(x,y) = (\sin(t) kt, \cos(t) kt) \in \Qb \times \Qb.$$

If $x$ and $y$ are algebraic, then so is

$$\sqrt{x^2+y^2} = kt.$$

But then $x/kt = \sin(t)$ and $y/kt = \cos(t)$ are algebraic, and hence $e^{i t} = \cos(t) + i \sin(t)$ is also all algebraic.

Let us consider values of $t$ for which $e^{i t}$ and $kt$ are both algebraic. Suppoes this happens for two distinct points $s$ and $t$. Then $k s$ and $k t$ are algebraic, and so their ratio $\beta = s/t$ is also algebraic. But so are $\alpha = e^{i t}$ and $e^{i s}$. In particular,

$$\alpha^{\beta} = (e^{i t})^{s/t} = e^{i s}$$

is also algebraic. By the Gelfond–Schneider theorem, this implies that $\alpha = 0,1$ or $\beta$ is rational. Certainly $\alpha \ne 0$. If $\alpha = 1$, then we can reverse the roles of $s$ and $t$. If $e^{i s}$ is also $1$, then $s$ and $t$ are multiples of $2 \pi i$ and the conclusion that $\beta = s/t$ is rational still holds. Hence $s/t$ is rational for any two algebraic points on the spiral, and hence all the algebraic points must occur when $t$ is a rational multiple of some fixed value $\tau$.

Conversely, if $P = (x,y)$ is algebraic for $t = \tau$, then $P$ will also be algebraic for exactly the rational multiples of $\tau$. (We don't use this below, but it is easy).

Now consider the problem of rational points. Certainly rational points are algebraic, so we may deduce from the previous argument that $P$ is rational only for rational multiples of a fixed value $\tau$ of $t$. If $x$ and $y$ are rational for a fixed $\tau$,

$$\sqrt{x^2 + y^2} = k \tau$$

lives in an extension $E/\Q$ of degree at most two. But then

$$\alpha:=e^{i \tau} = \cos(\tau) + i \sin(\tau) \in E(i)$$

lives in an extension of degree at most four. We know that all the other algebraic points on the spiral have to occur for a rational multiple $r$ of this $\tau$. But for what rational numbers $r$ does

$$\alpha^r = e^{i r \tau}$$

live inside an extension of $\Q$ of degree at most $4$ when $\alpha$ itself has degree at most $4$? It's an elementary fact(* see below) from algebraic number theory that this will happen only for $r$ with denominator $D$ bounded absolutely in terms of $\alpha$. This implies that the rational points on the spiral will be discrete.

Here's a sketch of (*). First consider the case when $\alpha$ is a root of unity. Then $\tau$ is rational. But then $e^{i r \tau}$ is also root of unity, and this has degree at most four only if it is an $N$th root of unity with $\varphi(N) \le 4$, which occurs for only finitely many $N$. Thus we may assume $\alpha$ is not a root of unity, and it suffices to show that the degree of the fields:

$$E(\alpha), E(\alpha^{1/2}), E(\alpha^{1/3}), E(\alpha^{1/4}), \ldots $$

tends to infinity. (If $(r,s) = 1$, then $E(\alpha^{r/s}) = E(\alpha^{1/s})$.) Certainly $\alpha$ is not a $p$th power for sufficiently large $p$: either it has non-trivial valuation at some prime $\p$, in which case it's not a $p$th power for $p$ larger than the valuation at $\p$, or it's a unit, and the result follows from the structure of the unit group assuming that $\alpha$ is not a root of unity. Thus $X^p - \alpha$ is irreducible for large enough $p$, which implies that $E(\alpha^{1/p})$ has degree at least $p$ for those $p$. On the other hand, for a fixed $p$, the same argument shows that $\alpha$ is a $p^m$th power for only finitely many $m$, in which case the degree of $E(\alpha^{1/p^{m+1}})$ is at least $p$, and by repeating this argument, the degree of $E(\alpha^{1/p^n})$ tends to infinity with $n$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.