0
$\begingroup$

I have an exercise asking me to show that a set $S$ with two operations $(\oplus_S,\otimes_S)$ is a ring.

I think I've completed all the requirements but want to make sure:

Is it enough to show that

  1. S is commutative under $\oplus_S$.
  2. Multiplication $\otimes_S$ is associative.
  3. That the distributive property holds.

I have proved all these already but are there any more that are required?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What you need to show is precisely the axioms given in whatever definition of a ring you have... $\endgroup$ – Prince M Mar 25 '17 at 6:58
  • $\begingroup$ For example, some define a ring to be commutative with unit, but in general it need not have either property $\endgroup$ – Prince M Mar 25 '17 at 6:59
  • $\begingroup$ But you're going to need to show that it has both a multiplicative and additive identity and closed for both operations $\endgroup$ – Prince M Mar 25 '17 at 7:00
1
$\begingroup$

You still need to show that:

  1. $\oplus_S$ has a neutral element.

  2. $\oplus_S$ is associative.

  3. If $0_S$ is the aforementioned additive neutral element, that $\oplus_S$ has opposites, id est, that for all $a$ there is $b$ such that $a\oplus_S b= 0_S$ and $b\oplus_S a=0_S$.

  4. If your definition of ring requires it (most of them do), that $\otimes_S$ has a neutral element as well.

Some would say that you also need to check "closedness under operations", which would technically mean showing that $$\forall a,b\in S,\ (a\oplus_S b\in S\wedge a\otimes_S b\in S)$$ This is reminescent of one of the verifications that you need to do when you check that something is a subring of something else. In this case, it would be an abuse of terminology, because clearly $\oplus_S$ and $\otimes_S$ should already be functions with codomain $S$. What should be checked beforehand in this case is that $\oplus_S$ and $\otimes_S$ are two well-defined functions $S\times S\to S$.

What does that mean? Describing it in general is a bit abstract, but somewhere you have a predicate which describes what property, say, $a\oplus_S b$ is meant to satisfy with repsect to $a,b\in S$. Call that property $P(a,b;y)$ (and the definition somehow goes like "$a\oplus_S b$ is the one element satisfying $P(a,b; a\oplus_Sb)$" ). Then you must prove that, for any $a,b\in S$ there is exactly one element $y$ in $S$ such that $P(a,b;y)$ is true. Id est: $$\forall a,b\in S,((\exists y\in S,\ P(a,b;y))\wedge (\forall w,y\in S, (P(a,b;w)\wedge P(a,b;y)\longrightarrow w=y)))$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.