Solve $ {3}{x}\mathrm{{=}}{e}^{x} $

Solving graphically with the help of a grapher tool we get $x\approx 1.8$ and approx $4.5$.

Which properties of exponential functions tells us that there will be two solutions?

Are there always two solutions when a (linear function )= an (exponential function)?

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Hint: a straight line intersects a convex (or concave) curve at at most $2$ points. $\endgroup$ – dxiv Mar 23 '17 at 5:53

Let $f(x) = 3x - e^x$. Then $f(0) = -1$ and $f(1) = 3 - e > 0$, so by the IVT $f$ has a zero in $(0,1)$. But $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x) = -\infty$, so there must be another zero in $(1,\infty)$. On the other hand, $f(x) < 0$ for all $x < 0$, so there are no zeros in $(-\infty,0)$. Thus $f$ has exactly two zeros.

There will not always be two solutions. Consider $x = e^x$ and $x + 1 = e^x$.


The slope of the tangent at the graph of $f(x)=e^x$ at $x=\log(3)$ is exactly $3$. Since $f(x)$ is a convex function, any line with slope $3$ that lies above the line $y=3(x-\log 3)+3$ meets the graph of $f(x)$ at exactly two points.

Additionally, since $e^x\approx 3+3(x-\log(3))+\frac{3}{2}(x-\log(3))^2$ in a neighbourhood of $x=\log(3)$, the two solutions of $e^x=3x$ are reasonably close to $\log(3)\pm\sqrt{2(\log(3)-1)}$. If we start Newton's method at such points, we find accurate approximations of the actual roots in very few steps. And by Lagrange inversion theorem, the smallest root has the "closed" form $$\zeta_0 = \sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{n^{n-1}}{n! 3^n} $$ that by chance is pretty close to the golden ratio $\frac{-1+\sqrt{5}}{2}$.


Ethan Alwaise sshowed that there are two roots.

In fact, you will learn sooner or later that any equation which can write $$A+Bx+C\log(D+Ex)=0$$ has (real and/or complex) solution(s) in terms of Lambert function.

Four your case, the solutions are given by $$x_1=-W\left(-\frac{1}{3}\right)\approx 0.619061$$ $$x_2=-W_{-1}\left(-\frac{1}{3}\right)\approx1.51213$$

The Wikipedia page gives series expansion which would allow you to compute the numerical values.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ (+1) I find it odd you did not mention Newton's method for approximating $W$ and $W_{-1}$ close to the origin! $\endgroup$ – Jack D'Aurizio Mar 23 '17 at 6:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.