4
$\begingroup$

I would like to prove:

$1. \qquad P ∧ ¬Q ∧ R → S \qquad (Premise)$

$2. \qquad ¬(P → S) \qquad (Premise)$

$ ...$

$3. \qquad R → Q \qquad$

with access to these rules (http://imgur.com/kPZEYtG) However I am not sure how to proceed after this step:


As a side note does anyone know how to enter $P ∧ ¬Q ∧ R → S, ¬(P → S) ⊢ R → Q$ into this great online natural deduction with steps tool I am not sure how to enter premises.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The question appears to be wrong because $(¬Q \land R)$ and $(R \rightarrow Q)$ is a contradiction $\endgroup$ – Harambe Mar 21 '17 at 4:59
  • $\begingroup$ Is the first premise supposed to say $ P ∧ ¬Q ∧ R \rightarrow S$? $\endgroup$ – browngreen Mar 21 '17 at 5:04
  • $\begingroup$ sorry fixed @Shanye2020 $\endgroup$ – Fidel Castro Mar 21 '17 at 5:32
  • $\begingroup$ yes @browngreen $\endgroup$ – Fidel Castro Mar 21 '17 at 5:33
  • $\begingroup$ Are you allowed to use deduction theorem? You can prove (P & -Q & R => S) => ((-(P=>S))=>(R=>Q)) with the tool. $\endgroup$ – ged Mar 21 '17 at 5:49
1
$\begingroup$

Here is a straightforward proof:

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What tool is that? $\endgroup$ – Fidel Castro Mar 25 '17 at 3:18
  • $\begingroup$ It's called Fitch, it comes with the book Language, Proof, and Logic. $\endgroup$ – Bram28 Mar 25 '17 at 12:18
0
$\begingroup$

Lets prove it by contradiction.

We will try to make the Premises as True and Conclusion as False. (If we are not able to do this, then the inference is True)

To make the conclusion R→Q false, we must take R as True and Q as False (no other way we can make it false).

Considering these values of R and Q let us try to make the premises as True.

Premise 1: P ^ -Q ^ R→S

We have to take R as True and Q as false. So, P ^ -Q (True) ^ R (True)→S

This expression can be made True only by putting P as True and S as True. If any of these are False, Premise 1 becomes False.

Premise 2: -(P→S)

We have already taken P as True and S as True. So Premise 2 becomes False.

Therefore there is no such case when the Premises are True and Conclusion is False.

Hence the Inference is True. Proved.

Hope it helped.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.