In the citation

Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 (1951), 839-848

originally found here:


How should I interpret the 2?


closed as off-topic by symplectomorphic, mrp, carmichael561, Daniel W. Farlow, John B Mar 16 '17 at 22:11

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question is not about mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center." – symplectomorphic, mrp, carmichael561, Daniel W. Farlow, John B
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ It's the second volume that ever appeared of that journal. $\endgroup$ – Friedrich Philipp Mar 16 '17 at 1:42

If you look at the part "1951-002-06" of the cited link or follow the link on the page to "this issue", you would have found out that this article is part of "volume 2, number 6".

Speculation: Since most libraries will have since combined the issues of that year into one book, i.e., you will rarely find the journals as separate entities, they have left out the number in the recommended citation format.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.