What are the eigenvalues of the following $n\times n$ skew-symmetric matrix: $$ M=A-A^T, $$ where $n>2$ can be odd or even, and $A=(a_{ij})_{n\times n}$ has $a_{1,n}=-1$ and $a_{ij}=1$ for $j=i+1, i=1,\dots, n-1$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What makes you expect a closed form exists? $\endgroup$ – Ian Mar 15 '17 at 3:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For $n=5$, the characteristic polynomial factors over $\mathbb{Q}$ as $x \cdot (x^{4} + 5 x^{2} + 5)$. I don't think you should expect anything nice. $\endgroup$ – darij grinberg Mar 15 '17 at 3:41
  • $\begingroup$ @darijgrinberg That particular example is not particularly bad (the roots of $x^4+5x^2+5$ are just the two square roots of the two roots of $x^2+5x+5$). But I suspect it will eventually get very bad. $\endgroup$ – Ian Mar 15 '17 at 3:45

$$\{\zeta^{r}-\zeta^{-r}|r=0,\dots,n-1\}$$ where $\zeta$ is some primitive $n$-th root of unity.

Edited to provide more information.

To see this note that we are looking at the matrix $\Omega-\Omega^{-1}$, where $\Omega$ is the simple circulant that permutes the basis vectors in an $n$-cycle. The eigenvalues of $\Omega$ are well-known, being the powers of $\zeta$; the matrix formed by the putting the eigenvectors as columns is $\left(\zeta^{(i-1)(j-1)}\right)$.

  • $\begingroup$ @John Your $M$ is an instance of circulant matrices, which have a general eigenvalue formula. $\endgroup$ – user1551 Mar 15 '17 at 8:57
  • $\begingroup$ @user1551 4 A difference of a circulant and its inverse surely? $\endgroup$ – ancientmathematician Mar 15 '17 at 9:01
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but $M$ itself is also circulant: it has two circulant diagonals, one extending from the $(1,2)$-th entry (with coefficient $1$) and the other from the $(1,n)$-th entry (with coefficient $-1$). The set of all circulant matrices actually form an algebra. $\endgroup$ – user1551 Mar 15 '17 at 9:10
  • $\begingroup$ @user1551. Sorry, I see "circulant" is wider in meaning than I had supposed. It doesn't affect the maths, though. It would be good to know where this problem arises: or is it just an exercise? $\endgroup$ – ancientmathematician Mar 15 '17 at 9:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Ian $A+A^T$ is not circulant, but the entries of its eigenvectors still satisfy a 2nd order recurrence equation, so there should be a closed-form formula for the eigenvalues. $\endgroup$ – user1551 Mar 15 '17 at 10:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.