1
$\begingroup$

Let $K$ be either $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be a finite-dimensional normed vector space on $K$. More specifically, let $e_1,\cdots,e_n$ be a basis of $\mathcal{X}$. The norm is defined as $\|\sum a_j e_j\| := \sum |a_j|$.

I would like to show that $S = \{x\in\mathcal{X}:\|x\|=1\}$ is compact. I have managed to show that $S$ is sequentially compact, but I'm not sure how to show that it is compact. I know Heine–Borel theorem but I thought it only works in $\mathbb{R}^n$.

Some solutions online use the fact that all norms are equivalent in finitely-dimensional normed space. But ultimately I want to prove that claim, and I suppose showing $S$ is compact is part of the proof.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\mathbb{C}^n=\mathbb{R}^{2n}$ and the norms are the same, so you can use Heine-Borel. $\endgroup$ – Spenser Mar 11 '17 at 9:12
  • $\begingroup$ @Spenser That's one thing that I'm not sure about. I know that if two vector space have same dimensions, then they are isomorphic to each other as vector space. But that doesn't seem to say anything about their topology? $\endgroup$ – 3x89g2 Mar 11 '17 at 9:14
  • $\begingroup$ Yes they have the same topology since that topology is defined by the norm, and these two norms are the same. $\endgroup$ – Spenser Mar 11 '17 at 9:16
  • $\begingroup$ @Spenser Exactly. But "two norms are the same" is something that I want to prove, right? $\endgroup$ – 3x89g2 Mar 11 '17 at 9:17
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, just note that $|x_1+iy_1|^2+\cdots+|x_n+iy_n|^2=x_1^2+y_1^2+\cdots+x_n^2+y_n^2$. $\endgroup$ – Spenser Mar 11 '17 at 9:18
1
$\begingroup$

Sequential compactness is equivalent to compactness in metric (so also normed) spaces. So you were actually done already.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ One more reason to review my topology! $\endgroup$ – 3x89g2 Mar 13 '17 at 15:05
2
$\begingroup$

For $a=(a_1,\ldots,a_n) \in \mathbb{K}^n$ define

$$f(a) := \sum_{j=1}^n a_j e_j \in \mathcal{X}.$$

As $f:\mathbb{K}^n \to \mathcal{X}$ is a linear function, it is not difficult to see that $f$ is continuous and bijective. Since

$$S = \{x \in \mathcal{X}; \|x\| = 1\} = f \bigg( \underbrace{\left\{ (a_1,\ldots,a_n) \in \mathbb{K}^n; \sum_{j=1}^n |a_j| =1 \right\}}_{\text{compact subset of $\mathbb{K}^n$}} \bigg)$$

we find that $S$ is compact as an image of a compact set under a continuous mapping.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

This answer is more or less in response to your uncertainty in the comments. We use the following lemma:

Lemma: Let $x_1,\dots,x_n$ b a collection of linearly independent vectors in a normed space $X$. Then there exists some $c>0$ such that for every choice of $\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n$ we have $$\|\alpha_1 x_1+\dots+\alpha_n x_n\| \geq c(|\alpha_1|+\dots|\alpha_n|).$$

A full proof of this Lemma can be found in Chapter $2$ of Kreyzwig's introductory functional analysis.

Theorem: On a finite dimensional vector space $X$, all norms are equivalent (they generate the same topology since there exist positive scalars so that $$a\|x\|_0 \leq \|x\| \leq b\|x\|_0.$$

proof: Specify a basis $e_1,...,e_n$. Then every $x=\alpha_1 e_1+ \dots+\alpha_n e_n$ By the lemma we can find $c$ so that $$\|x\| \geq c)|\alpha_1|+\dots+|\alpha_n|).$$

But then we take the maximum: $k:=\mathrm{max} \|e_j\|_0$, and apply the triangle inequality:

$$\|x_0\| \leq \sum_{i=1}^{n}|\alpha_i| \|e_i\|_0 \leq k\sum_{i=1}^{n} |\alpha_i|.$$

Hence, $\frac{c}{k} \|x\|_0 \leq \|x\|$. The other inequality is the same process, switching the roles of the norms.

A different proof can be found here.

Anyhow, we know that we can already think of any norm topologically as euclidian, so Heine-Borel applies.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.