3
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $A$ is a finite dimensional algebra over the real or complex numbers. Then $A$ has a natural topology induced from it being a finite dimensional vector space. Is it always true that there is a norm on $A$ satisfying $\| MN \| \leq \| M \| \| N \|$, or are there some finite dimensional algebras which aren't `Banachable'? If we weaken the norm to not being complete, do we obtain stronger results?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Every finite dimensional normed space is complete, so there is no weakening/strengthening in that direction. $\endgroup$ – Jonas Meyer Mar 10 '17 at 23:19
5
$\begingroup$

Since $A$ is a finite-dimensional vector space, we can define a norm (any $\ell^p$-norm will do). Since $A$ is finite-dimensional, any linear operator is continuous with respect to this norm. To each $a\in A$ we can associate a linear map $x\mapsto ax$. Thus considering $A$ as a subalgebra of $L(A)$ with the operator norm, we obtain a norm on $A$ which is submultiplicative.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'm currently away from the PC, I'll expand on this when I return $\endgroup$ – Aweygan Mar 10 '17 at 23:20
  • $\begingroup$ Of course! I forgot that any Banach space with a continuous multiplication structure has an equivalent norm upon which it is a Banach algebra. I should really reread Rudin at some point. $\endgroup$ – Jacob Denson Mar 10 '17 at 23:42
  • $\begingroup$ @JacobDenson yeah I definitely got the idea from the first few pages of chapter 10 $\endgroup$ – Aweygan Mar 10 '17 at 23:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.