If $p:E_0\rightarrow B_0$ is a fibration, $f:B\rightarrow B_0$ is a homotopy equivalence, then by pullback we get maps $\text{pr}_2:E:=B\times_{B_0}E_0 \rightarrow E_0$ and $\text{pr}_1:E:=B\times_{B_0}E_0 \rightarrow B$. It is well-known that $\text{pr}_1$ must be a fibration. I wish to prove $\text{pr}_2$ is a homotopy equivalence.

I have constructed a map $\ell$ which I suspect to be its homotopy inverse. Unfortunately, when I try to construct a homotopy $\ell \circ \text{pr}_2 \simeq \text{id}_E$, I can only do so "coordinate-wise", i.e. we have $\text{pr}_1 \circ \ell \circ \text{pr}_2 \simeq \text{pr}_1$ and $\text{pr}_2 \circ \ell \circ \text{pr}_2 \simeq \text{pr}_2$. However, these are not enough to prove $\ell \circ \text{pr}_2 \simeq \text{id}_E$ since the resulting homotopy $h:I \times E \rightarrow B \times E_0 \supset E$ might not stay at all times inside $E$ (even though it does stay inside $E$ at times $0$ and $1$).

This is lemma 2.1 in this link: http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~franklan/Math527_0308.pdf But they leave it as an exercise to the reader, although unfortunately I have failed to prove it.

Would anyone have any hints? Thanks!

  • $\begingroup$ See math.stackexchange.com/questions/38232/… The dual of the therem merntioneed there is a gluing theorem for homotopy equivalences available in "Topology and Groupoids" 7,5.7 groupoids.org.uk/topgpds.html $\endgroup$ – Ronnie Brown Mar 7 '17 at 10:19
  • $\begingroup$ Ronnie, is this the easiest way to prove the result? I must admit the paper is really challenging, I'm reading through it. $\endgroup$ – Juan Carlos Ortiz Mar 7 '17 at 17:25
  • $\begingroup$ I find the dual result for cofibrations and pushouts easier to "see". You can find this in Chapter 7 of "Topology and Groupoids" downloadable from my web page. Maybe 7.4.2 (Addendum) on the homotopies involved shows why the result is not so easy. . $\endgroup$ – Ronnie Brown Mar 8 '17 at 17:07

Thank you for pointing to my notes. The exercise was trickier than I made it sound, so I posted an expanded version. The statement is now Proposition 2.3 here:



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.