# The zero divisors of $\Bbb Z/5\Bbb Z\times \Bbb Z/18\Bbb Z$.

For $\Bbb Z/5\Bbb Z\times \Bbb Z/18\Bbb Z$, I know that $\Bbb Z/5\Bbb Z$ has no zero divisors because $5$ is prime and that the zero divisors of $\Bbb Z/18\Bbb Z=\{_{18},_{18},_{18},_{18},_{18},_{18},_{18},_{18},_{18},_{18},_{18}\}$.

For the zero divisor of $\Bbb Z/5\Bbb Z\times \Bbb Z/18\Bbb Z$, would I say then that it does not exist because there does not exist an zero divisor of the form $([a]_{5},[b]_{18})$ or $([a]_{5},_{18})$? Or, can I say that it does exist because a zero divisor of the form $(_{5},[b]_{18})$ exists so the zero divisor of $Z/5\Bbb Z\times \Bbb Z/18\Bbb Z=\{(_{5},[b]_{18}):b=2,3,4,6,8,9,10,12,14,15,16\}$? Am I allowed to include $b=0$ into this set?

I am kind of confused about if and why we are allowed to include $_{5}$ even though it is not a zero divisor so if anyone could shed some light onto this, that would be most appreciated. Thanks a lot. :)

## 1 Answer

It is the latter.

To show that $(_5,_{18})$ is a legitimate zero divisor, for example, you must show that you can multiply $(_5,_{18})$ by something in $\mathbb Z_5 \times \mathbb Z_{18}$ to give zero. Indeed, $$(_5,_{18}). (_5,_{18}) = (_5,_{18}).$$ That is how you would write it formally.

And yes, $(_5,_{18})$ itself is a zero divisor, because $(_5,_{18})$ times anything is zero.

• Okay cool thanks! I thought so, but I felt kinda awkward to do, so I figured I'd ask about it. Thanks :) – eulersnumber Mar 7 '17 at 0:27