I do not get why every maximal ideal of $K[X_1,...,X_n]$ is of the form $n=(X_1-a_1,...,X_n-a_n)$. (where I assume $K$ algebraically closed field)

Taking the quotient I deduce that actually $n$ is maximal. However given a maximal ideal $m$ the textbook suggests me to consider the homomorphism $f:K[X_1,...,X_n]\to K[X_1,...,X_n]/m $ given by $X_i\to a_i$.

How do I continue? Why $n$ is contained in $m$? I noticed that $f(n)=0$ since every generator of $n$ goest to $0$, but I can't see the thesis. I think it should be a small detail.

Any hints?

  • $\begingroup$ Do you know Hilbert's nullstellensatz? $\endgroup$ – Kenny Wong Mar 1 '17 at 21:57
  • $\begingroup$ Which version? Please state the version you find useful $\endgroup$ – Richard Mar 1 '17 at 21:58
  • $\begingroup$ The thing you state IS one of the versions of the nullstellensatz. $\endgroup$ – Kenny Wong Mar 1 '17 at 21:59

I'm going to rewrite your ideals $n,m$ as $\frak n,m$ to make the notation clearer.

Okay, so we have a maximal ideal $\frak m$, and we want to show that it is of the form $(X_1-a_1,\dots,X_n-a_n)$ for some $a_i\in K$.

Now, since $\frak m$ is maximal, $K[X_1,\dots,X_n]/\mathfrak m$ is a field, and in particular it is isomorphic to $K$ since $K$ is algebraically closed.

(Note in the last paragraph I am actually glossing over an important detail: the field $K[X_1,\dots,X_n]/\mathfrak m$ is finitely generated as a $K$-algebra, which by a version of the Nullstellensatz implies that it is finitely generated as a $K$-module, i.e. it is a finite extension of $K$.)

Now, from this isomorphism we can associate to each residue $\overline X_i$ an element $a_i\in K$. We then claim that $\mathfrak m$ is equal to $\mathfrak n=(X_1-a_1,\dots,X_n-a_n)$. To see this, since we know $\mathfrak n$ is maximal, it suffices to show $\mathfrak n\subseteq\mathfrak m$. To do this, we just need to show that $X_i-a_i\in\mathfrak m$ for each $i$, since these elements generate $\mathfrak n$. However, this is easy since if we consider the composition

$$K[X_1,\dots,X_n]\to K[X_1,\dots,X_n]/\mathfrak m\overset{\sim}{\to}K,$$

this is really just a map sending $X_i\to a_i$ and fixing elements of $K$. Clearly then $X_i-a_i$ is mapped to zero, i.e. $X_i-a_i$ is in the kernel, which is equal to $\mathfrak m$.

  • $\begingroup$ @Richard yes that's exactly it! $\endgroup$ – Alex Mathers Mar 1 '17 at 22:10

I assume you know about Zariski's Lemma:

Let $K$ be a field and let $A$ be a finitely generated $K$-algebra. If $A$ is a field, then it is a finite extension of $K$.

Applying this in your situation to $A=K[X_1,\ldots,X_n]/\mathfrak{m}$ shows that the canonical map $K\to A$ is an isomorphism since $K$ is algebraically closed. In particular, you may choose a preimage $a_i\in K$ of $X_i + \mathfrak{m}$ for each $i=1,\ldots,n$. But then the projection $\pi \colon K[X_1,\ldots,X_n]\to A$ sends $X_i-a_i$ to $0$, i.e. $(X_1-a_1,\ldots,X_n-a_n)\subset \mathfrak{m}$, which implies that $\mathfrak{m}=(X_1-a_1,\ldots,X_n-a_n)$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.