2
$\begingroup$

Possible Duplicate:
Norms Induced by Inner Products and the Parallelogram Law

Trying to prove if an norm satisfies the Parallelogram Law then a norm arises from an inner product.

Let $||\cdot||$ be any norm on $\mathcal{X}$, namely any function that satisfies:

1.$ ||x|| >0 \ \forall x \neq 0, \\ $

2.$||\alpha x|| = |\alpha|*||x|| \ \ \ \forall \alpha \in \mathbb{C}, x\in \mathcal{X},$

3.$||x_1 + x_2|| \leq ||x_1|| + ||x_2||\ \forall x_1,x_2 \in \mathcal{X},$

4.$||x_1 + x_2||^2 + ||x_1 - x_2||^2 = 2||x_1||^2 + 2||x_2||^2 \ \forall x_1, x_2 \in \mathcal{X}.$

$\mathbf{If}$ an inner product existed such that it would arise from a norm, we define this inner product uniquely in terms of our norm by Polarization Identity namely:

$\langle x_1,x_2 \rangle = \frac{1}{4}(||x_1 + x_2||^2 - ||x_1 - x_2||^2 + i ||x_1 - ix_2||^2 - i||x_1 + ix_2||^2)$.
Show this inner product satisfies $||x|| = \sqrt{ \langle x,x \rangle}$ and also satisfies the four properties of an inner product:

i. $\langle x_1,x_2+x_3 \rangle = \langle x_1,x_2 \rangle + \langle x_1,x_3 \rangle \ \forall x_1,x_2,x_3 \in \mathcal{X}$

ii.$\langle x_1, \alpha x_2 \rangle = \alpha \langle x_1,x_2 \rangle \ \forall x_1,x_2\in \mathcal{X}, \ \forall \alpha \in \mathbb{C} $

iii.$\langle x_1, x_2 \rangle = \langle x_2,x_1 \rangle^* \ \forall x_1,x_2\in \mathcal{X}$

iv.$\langle x, x \rangle > 0 \ \forall x \neq 0.$

Hint:\ Use assumptions 1 to 4 to prove i to iv. Use(4) to prove (i). To prove (ii), fix any $x_1, x_2$ and consider the set $\lbrace \alpha \in \mathbb{C}: \langle x_1, \alpha x_2 \rangle = \alpha \langle x_1,x_2 \rangle \rbrace.$ Show that this set contains $ \alpha = 0,\alpha = \pm 1$ and $\alpha = i$. Moreover, show that this set is closed under addition(using(i)),subtraction, multiplication and division. Finally, show this set is closed under limits. Use these facts to show that this set contains all integers, and thus all rational numbers, and thus all real numbers, and thus all complex numbers.

I have been able to prove iii and iv but have been stuck trying to prove i and ii. I am having trouble showing how to bring the alpha from inside the inner product to the outside using the Polarization identity. Thinking some way to factor it out would work but not sure if making a substitution would work. I know I need 4 to prove i but having troulbe finding how to simplify when I have $x_1, x_2$ and $x_3$ and I need to separate from three to two variables. Any help is greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by kahen, Noah Snyder, rschwieb, Hagen von Eitzen, Emily Oct 19 '12 at 14:58

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. That helps with a lot of what I am trying to show. I still am not quite sure how to show inner product of (x_1, (x_2 + x_3)) = inner product(x_1,x_2) + inner product(x_1,x_3). This is assumed in the over post. $\endgroup$ – user45185 Oct 19 '12 at 3:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Use the symmetry $(y,x) = \overline{(x,y)}$ together with additivity in the first variable. $\endgroup$ – commenter Oct 19 '12 at 5:33
  • $\begingroup$ I just noticed something. Why was this tagged with "harmonic-analysis"?! $\endgroup$ – kahen Oct 19 '12 at 15:01
  • $\begingroup$ It is from my applied harmonic analysis class. commenter, I get that if I bar the inner product and have additivity they are equal but how do I use polarization to prove the inner products are equal? $\endgroup$ – user45185 Oct 19 '12 at 17:29